首页> 外文期刊>建筑学研究前沿(英文版) >A copy is (not a simple) copy: Role of urban landmarks in branding Seoul as a global city
【24h】

A copy is (not a simple) copy: Role of urban landmarks in branding Seoul as a global city

机译:复制是(不是简单的)复制:城市地标在将首尔打造成全球城市的品牌中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper examines the role of urban landmark design in Seoul,after the structural adjustment in the late 1990s,in branding Seoul's image as a global city.The topic of urban branding through the use of works of well-known architects has generated much debate,with many arguing that this practice involves a mere culture of the copy,or a thin veneer for a neoliberal urban redevelopment agenda.The case study sites examined in this paper-Some Sevit (Floating Island),Dongdaemun Design Plaza,and Seoullo 7017-are examples of the "free-form" architecture commissioned by the Seoul city government in the hope of generating a "Bilbao Effect," and thereby promoting tourism in the area.This paper argues that although contemporary urban landmarks in Seoul have the potential to become brandscapes,they do not all stop short at becoming mere copies or a temporary fad.Rather,the conditions under which each landmark is reproduced are deeply situated,and the gap between aspiration and reality brings in different results.
机译:本文研究了1990年代后期的结构调整后,首尔城市地标设计在塑造首尔全球城市形象中的作用。通过使用知名建筑师的作品来进行城市品牌化的话题引起了很多争论,许多人争辩说,这种做法仅涉及复制文化,或者是针对新自由主义城市重建议程的薄木皮。本文研究的案例研究地点为:一些Sevit(浮岛),东大门设计广场和Seoullo 7017。首尔市政府委托的“自由形式”建筑的示例,旨在产生“毕尔巴鄂效应”,从而促进该地区的旅游业。本文认为,尽管首尔的当代城市地标具有成为品牌景观的潜力,它们并不仅会短暂地成为复制品或暂时的风尚。相反,重现每个地标的条件都处在深处,渴望与现实之间的鸿沟给我带来了机遇。 n个不同的结果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《建筑学研究前沿(英文版)》 |2019年第1期|44-54|共11页
  • 作者

    Jieheerah Yun;

  • 作者单位

    School of Architecture, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Republic of Korea;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 04:27:08
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号