首页> 中文期刊> 《森林生态系统:英文版 》 >Nutrient resorption strategies of three oak tree species in response to interannual climate variability

Nutrient resorption strategies of three oak tree species in response to interannual climate variability

             

摘要

Background:Nutrient resorption is critical for plants toward balancing their nutritional requirements and adapting to environmental variabilities,which further impacts litter quality and nutrient cycling.However,the interannual variability of nutrient resorption under climate change remains unclear.Methods:We investigated the five-year nutrient resorption efficiencies(NuRE,%)of 14 elements in three deciduous oak tree species(Quercus aliena var.acuteserrata,Q.glandulifera,and Q.variabilis)in a warm-temperate forest of Central China and assessed their relationships with interannual climate and soil factors.Results:Nutrient resorption did not differ between species but varied significantly between different years.For each year,N,P,S,K,C,Mg,and Zn were preferentially resorbed in all of the oak species in contrast to Ca,Na,Mn,Ba,Al,Fe,Cu,which were to some extent discriminated.Among the 14 elements,the NuRE of C,N,P,S,Ca,and Mg was more sensitive to interannual climate variations in the three oak species.The carbon resorption efficiency was significantly increased during the driest year of the study(2014);N resorption efficiency was reduced with temperature;whereas N and P resorption efficiency initially decreased and then increased with precipitation.Moreover,the elements with higher NuREs typically had lower coefficient of variation(CV)in all three oak species.Conclusions:Different oak species exhibited analogous nutrient conservation strategies in response to annual climate variabilities,and interannual climate variations strongly impacted plant nutrient resorption.Deciduous plants may establish a tradeoff mechanism to rebalance somatic nutrients for regrowth at the end of the growing season.

著录项

  • 来源
    《森林生态系统:英文版 》 |2021年第4期|P.937-947|共11页
  • 作者单位

    School of Agriculture and Biology Shanghai Jiao Tong University 200240 Shanghai China;

    School of Agriculture and Biology Shanghai Jiao Tong University 200240 Shanghai China;

    Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment China’s State Forestry Administration Research Institute of Forest Ecology Environment and Protection Chinese Academy of Forestry 100091 Beijing China;

    Shanghai Urban Forest Ecosystem Research Station State Forestry Administration 200240 Shanghai China;

    School of Agriculture and Biology Shanghai Jiao Tong University 200240 Shanghai ChinaShanghai Urban Forest Ecosystem Research Station State Forestry Administration 200240 Shanghai ChinaShanghai Yangtze River Delta Eco-environmental Change and Management Observation and Research Station Ministry of Science and Technology 200240 Shanghai China;

    School of Agriculture and Biology Shanghai Jiao Tong University 200240 Shanghai ChinaShanghai Urban Forest Ecosystem Research Station State Forestry Administration 200240 Shanghai ChinaShanghai Yangtze River Delta Eco-environmental Change and Management Observation and Research Station Ministry of Science and Technology 200240 Shanghai China;

  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 chi
  • 中图分类 海洋基础科学 ;
  • 关键词

    Nutrient resorption; Tradeoff mechanism; Climate change; Quercus spp.; Temperate forests;

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号