首页> 外文期刊>眼科学报(英文版) >Comparison of Applicability of Different Visual Acuity Charts for Pediatric Outpatient Visual Tests
【24h】

Comparison of Applicability of Different Visual Acuity Charts for Pediatric Outpatient Visual Tests

机译:不同视力表在小儿门诊视力检查中的适用性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the applicability of different visual acu-ity charts for outpatient pediatric visual tests. Methods: Fifty-three children (53 eyes) aged 4-8 years un-dergoing visual acuity tests as outpatients were randomly se-lected for this study. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the eye with better visual acuity was measured for each child using the digital LogMAR visual chart,.the ETDRS vi-sual chart,.and a new standard logarithm visual chart;.all measurements were repeated twice and the BCVA was record-ed. Paired comparisons were made between the LogMAR vi-sual acuity chart and ETDRS chart measurements or between the ETDRS chart and logarithm visual acuity chart measure-ments for statistical analysis of the differences in measurement of visual acuity..The results of different measurements by the same chart were compared to evaluate the consistency of the measurement results..Bland-Altman analysis was employed to evaluate the most suitable chart for outpatient measurement of visual acuity in children. Results:.Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the mean visual acuity measured was. (0.447 ±0.017 LogMAR).by the digital LogMAR chart,.(0.301±0.024 LogMAR).by the standard log-arithm visual acuity chart, and (0.309 ±0.018 LogMAR) by the ETDRS visual acuity chart. The BCVA was significantly lower when measured by the LogMAR visual acuity chart than by the ETDRS chart (P<0.01). The BCVA was slightly higher when measured by the logarithm visual acuity chart than by the ETDRS chart, but the difference was not statistically sig nificant(P>0.05)..The Bland-Altman plot showed that the high-est consistency was obtained with the digital LogMAR chart, with a difference between two repeated measurements of 0.068 LogMAR,.compared to 0.090 and 0.072 LogMAR for the logarithm and ETDRS visual acuity charts, respectively. Conclusion: All three types of visual acuity charts are appli-cable for outpatient measurement of pediatric visual acuity. The ETDRS and logarithm visual acuity charts have a higher consistency, but the LogMAR visual acuity chart shows better reproducibility..Consequently,.it is difficult to identify and distinguish which acuity chart is most suitable for cooperative children.
机译:目的:评估不同视力表在门诊儿科视觉检查中的适用性。方法:随机选择43名年龄在4-8岁的儿童(53只眼)作为门诊病人进行视力测试。使用数字LogMAR视力表,ETDRS视觉图和新的标准对数视力表,为每个孩子测量具有最佳视力的最佳矫正视力(BCVA),将所有测量重复两次并记录了BCVA。在LogMAR视觉视力表和ETDRS图测量之间或在ETDRS图和对数视力表测量之间进行配对比较,以统计分析视力测量的差异。相同测量的不同结果比较Bland-Altman分析来评估最适合儿童门诊视力测量的图表。结果:.Bland-Altman分析显示测得的平均视力为。 (0.447±0.017 LogMAR)(通过数字LogMAR图表),(0.301±0.024 LogMAR)(通过标准对数视力表)和(0.309±0.018 LogMAR)(通过ETDRS视力表)。用LogMAR视力表测得的BCVA明显低于用ETDRS图测得的BCVA(P <0.01)。用对数视敏度表测得的BCVA略高于用ETDRS图测得的BCVA,但差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05).Bland-Altman图表明,与数字LogMAR图表,两次重复测量之间的差异为0.068 LogMAR,而对数和ETDRS视敏度图表分别为0.090和0.072 LogMAR。结论:这三种类型的视力表均适用于门诊儿科视力测量。 ETDRS和对数视力表的一致性较高,但LogMAR视力表的再现性更好。因此,很难识别和区分哪种视力表最适合合作儿童。

著录项

  • 来源
    《眼科学报(英文版)》 |2014年第002期|90-94|共5页
  • 作者单位

    State Key Laboratory of 0phthalmology, Zhongshan 0phthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China;

    State Key Laboratory of 0phthalmology, Zhongshan 0phthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China;

    State Key Laboratory of 0phthalmology, Zhongshan 0phthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China;

    State Key Laboratory of 0phthalmology, Zhongshan 0phthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号