首页> 外文期刊>医学物理学、临床工程、放射肿瘤学(英文) >Acuros-Based Planning with Density Override for Lung SBRT by a Dynamic Conformal Arc Technique: Comparative Evaluation with AAA-Based Planning in Four-Dimensional Dose
【24h】

Acuros-Based Planning with Density Override for Lung SBRT by a Dynamic Conformal Arc Technique: Comparative Evaluation with AAA-Based Planning in Four-Dimensional Dose

机译:基于ACUROS的密度覆盖的肺部SBRT通过动态保形弧技术的规划:基于AAA的四维剂量的比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a planning strategy based on Acuros with density override in comparison with AAA without and with the override. Ten lung-tumor patients were selected with each PTV size around 2 - 4 cm and were imaged using slow scan, followed by four-dimensional (4D) imaging limited to the target. On each phase-specific image, gross tumor volume (GTV) was contoured. Summed over all phases, an integrated GTV (iGTV) was generated and copied to the slow scan. A treatment plan was created using a dynamic-conformal-arc technique with AAA to prescribe 60 Gy to 95% of PTV (iGTV + 0.5 cm). Each AAA-based plan was regenerated by overriding the density of the setup margin of PTV by GTV density (modeling tumor-position uncertainty). It was also regenerated with Acuros and the override. The three plans were validated in 4D dose to PTV, after similarly overriding PTV density (phase-specific), accurately calculating with Acuros, and summing the phase-specific plans through organ/dose registration. The Acuros-based plan with the override, the AAA-based plan, and the AAA-based plan with the override provided 4D PTV doses of 63.9, 67.9, and 62 Gy at D95%, respectively, averaged over all patients. The override with Acuros and AAA produced lesser 4D doses, closer to the associated 3D doses, respectively, than that without the override, with better conformity and inhomogeneity. With the override in common, Acuros provided a greater dose to PTV than that by AAA. The Acuros with the override, which was more accurate than the AAA without the override, is clinically recommended.
机译:本研究的目的是评估基于患有的患有密度覆盖的规划策略与AAA没有和覆盖相比。选择10名肺肿瘤患者,每个PTV大小约为2-4厘米,使用慢扫描成像,然后用四维(4D)成像限于目标。在每个相位特异性图像上,肿瘤粗糙度(GTV)是轮廓的。概括在所有阶段,生成集成的GTV(IGTV)并复制到缓慢扫描。使用具有AAA的动态共形弧技术产生治疗计划,以调度60 Gy至95%的PTV(IGTV + 0.5cm)。通过通过GTV密度覆盖PTV的设置边缘的密度(建模肿瘤位置不确定度)来再生每个基于AAA的计划。它也用acuros和覆盖进行了再生。在4D剂量中验证了三种计划,以PTV验证,经过同样覆盖PTV密度(相位特异性),用Acuros准确计算,并通过器官/剂量注册求解相位特异性计划。基于AAA的平面的基于AAA的计划和基于AAA的计划,其具有覆盖的覆盖,分别在D95%的63.9,67.9和62GY中分别在所有患者中平均了4D PTV剂量。与Acuros和AAA倍率产生较小4D剂量,更靠近相关联的3D剂量,分别比不超驰,具有更好的一致性和不均匀性。随着普通的覆盖,Acuros为PTV提供了更大的剂量,而不是AAA。临床推荐,具有覆盖的副血管比AAA更准确,在没有覆盖的情况下。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号