首页> 外文期刊>能源与动力工程(英文) >Assessment of Wind Power Density Based on Weibull Distribution in Region of Junin, Peru
【24h】

Assessment of Wind Power Density Based on Weibull Distribution in Region of Junin, Peru

机译:基于Weibull分布的风电密度评估秘鲁地区

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper appraises the accuracy of methods for calculating wind power density (WPD), by comparing measurement values to the shape and scale parameters of the Weibull distribution (WD). For the estimation of WD parameters, the Graphical method (GP), Empirical method of Justus (EMJ), Empirical method of Lysen (EML), Energy pattern factor method (EPF), and Maximum likelihood method (ML) are used. The accuracy of each method was evaluated via multiple metrics: Mean absolute bias error (MABE), Mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), Root mean square error (RMSE), Relative root mean square error (RRMSE), Correlation coefficient (R), and Index of agreement (IA). The study’s objective is to select the most suitable methods to evaluate the WD parameters (k?and?c) for calculating WDP in four meteorological stations located in Junin-Peru: Comas, Huasahuasi, Junin, and Yantac. According to the statistical index results, the ML, EMJ, and EML methods are the most accurate for each station, however,?it is important to note that the methods do not perform equally well in all stations, presumably the graphical conditions and external factors play a major role.
机译:本文通过将测量值与Weibull分布(WD)的形状和比例参数进行比较来评估计算风力密度(WPD)的方法的准确性。为了估计WD参数,使用图形方法(GP),纯血液(EMJ)的经验方法,赖恩(EML),能量模式法(EPF)和最大似然法(ML)。通过多个度量评估每种方法的准确性:平均绝对偏置误差(MABE),平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE),根均方误差(RMSE),相对根均方误差(RRMSE),相关系数(R),和协议指数(IA)。该研究的目标是选择最适合评估WD参数(K?和?C)的最适合的方法,用于在秘鲁的四个气象站计算WDP:Comas,Huasahuasi,Junin和Yantac。根据统计指标结果,ML,EMJ和EML方法对于每个站来说是最准确的,但是,重要的是要注意,这些方法在所有站点中不均匀地表现,可能是图形条件和外部因素发挥重要作用。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号