首页> 外文期刊>高能物理(英文) >Does the Penrose Suggestion as to Black Holes from a Prior Universe Showing Up in Today’s Universe Have Credibility? Examined from a Singular, and Nonsingular Beginning of Cosmological Expansion
【24h】

Does the Penrose Suggestion as to Black Holes from a Prior Universe Showing Up in Today’s Universe Have Credibility? Examined from a Singular, and Nonsingular Beginning of Cosmological Expansion

机译:PenRose建议与在今天宇宙中出现的先前宇宙中的黑洞有信誉吗?从奇异的奇数和宇宙的扩张开始审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We examine if there are grounds to entertain the Penrose suggestion as to black holes from a prior cycle of creation appearing in the present cosmos. There are two cases to consider. One a singular start to the Universe or as Karen Freeze and others have modeled a non-singular start. The two cases are different and touch upon the limits of validity of the Penrose singularity theorem. We will first of all state the two cases, singular and nonsingular, and then afterwards, briefly allude to the Penrose singularity theorem. The plausibility of the singular cosmological expansion start point w case analysis of Black holes from a prior universe will be discussed first Afterwards, a synopsis of the Penrose singularity theorem. After that, the Nonsingular case of a starting point of the expansion of the Universe will be entertained and described. Since the nonsingular start to the expansion of the Universe is not so well known, a considerable amount of space will be spent upon what I view as mathematical constructions allowing for its analysis. About the only way to ascertain these cases will be by GW astronomy, hence the details of GW production from the early Universe will be covered in excruciating detail. The methodology for that section is simple. Use a construction for a minimal time-step, then from there get emergent space-time conditions for a bridge from a nonsingular start to the universe, to potential Quantum gravity conditions. Our Methodology is to construct using a “trivial” solution to massive gravitons, and a nonsingular start for expansion of the universe. Our methodology has many unintended consequences, not the least is a relationship between a small timestep, which is called t, and then the minimum scale factor and even the tension or property values of the initial space-time wall, all of which are a consequence of a “trivial” solution taking into account “massive” gravitons. From there we next will in future articles postulate conditions for experimental detectors for subsequent data sets to obtain falsifiable data sets. Finally upon doing this, the outlines of the way to ascertain data sets as to either falsify or confirm the Penrose suggestion will be the final concluding part of the manuscript.
机译:我们检查是否有地面招待PenRose建议,从现有宇宙中出现的创作循环中的黑洞。有两种情况需要考虑。宇宙的一个单数开始或作为karen冻结等的人已经建模了一个非奇异的开始。两种情况不同,触及彭罗血奇异性定理的有效性的限制。我们将首先说明两种病例,单数和非奇妙,然后简要暗中暗中奇异的定理。奇异宇宙膨胀开始点的合理性首先将首先讨论先前宇宙的黑洞的情况下,彭源奇点定理的概要。之后,宇宙扩张的起点的非奇妙情况将被娱乐和描述。由于宇宙扩展的非垂直于扩展,因此将花费大量的空间,将在我视为允许其分析的数学结构上。关于确定这些病例的唯一方法是GW天文学,因此从早期宇宙的GW生产细节将被泄露细节。该部分的方法很简单。使用施工最小时间步骤,然后从那里获得从非奇妙开始到宇宙的桥梁的紧急空间条件,到潜在的量子重力条件。我们的方法是使用“琐碎”解决巨大的引力和宇宙扩展的婉言开始。我们的方法具有许多意外的后果,并非最不重要的是一个小时间的关系,它被称为t,然后是最小规模因子甚至初始时空墙的张力或属性值,所有这些都是结果考虑“巨大”格雷顿的“琐碎”解决方案。从那里,我们将在未来的文章中假设用于后续数据集的实验检测器的条件,以获得伪造的数据集。最后在这样做之后,确定数据集的概要为伪造或确认彭罗第建议将是稿件的最终结论部分。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号