首页> 外文期刊>国际护理科学(英文) >Flashlight contamination and effectiveness of two disinfectants in a stomatology hospital
【24h】

Flashlight contamination and effectiveness of two disinfectants in a stomatology hospital

机译:口腔医院手电筒污染和两种消毒剂的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aim: This study aims to assess the infection risks of flashlight contamination in a stomatology hospital and compare the disinfection effectiveness of alcohol (75%) and disinfecting wipes.Background: The flashlight is a basic non-critical medical device in oral and maxillofacial surgery wards. Wounds are mostly found in oral cavities;therefore, reusable flashlights may be a potential source of nosocomial infections (NIs). However, the microbial flora present in flashlights used in hospitals has not yet been explored. Methods: This study investigated the microbial contamination of 41 flashlights used in a stomatology hospital in Guangzhou in March 2016. Results: Results indicated that 75.6%(31/41) of the flashlights had microbial contamination. Gram-positive bacteria accounted for 72.7%(24/33)of the microbial groups contaminating the flashlights, and Gram-negative bacteria (21.2%, 7/33), and fungi (6.1%, 2/33) constituted the remaining contaminants. The predominantly isolated species was Staphyloccus (66.7%, 22/33), especially Staphylococcus aureus (24.2%, 8/33). Approximately 77.3%(17/22) of the types of bacteria detected in the hands were same as those in the corresponding flashlights. Both the bacterial overstandard and S. aureus detection rates of doctors'' flashlights were higher than those of nurses'' flashlights (16/17 vs. 14/23, 7/17 vs. 1/23, respectively) (P < 0.05). Moreover, both disinfectants performed excellently, and their eligibility rates were not significantly different (17/17 vs. 14/14) (P>0.05). Conclusion: Flashlights are potential causes of NIs. Disinfecting flashlights could be an effective and practical infection control method.
机译:目的:本研究旨在评估口腔医院医院手电筒污染的感染风险,并比较酒精(75%)和消毒Wipes.Background:手电筒是口腔和颌面外科病房的基本非关键医疗装置。伤口主要在口腔腔中发现;因此,可重复使用的手电筒可能是医院感染(NIS)的潜在来源。然而,医院使用的手电筒中的微生物植物尚未探讨。方法:本研究调查了2016年3月广州口腔医院使用的41手电筒的微生物污染。结果:结果表明,75.6%(31/41)的手电筒具有微生物污染。革兰氏阳性细菌占污染手电筒的微生物组的72.7%(24/33),革兰氏阴性细菌(21.2%,7/33)和真菌(6.1%,2/33)构成剩余的污染物。主要的孤立的物种是葡萄球菌(66.7%,22/33),特别是金黄色葡萄球菌(24.2%,8/33)。手中检测到的细菌类型约77.3%(17/22)与相应手电筒中的细菌相同。医生的细菌覆盖和金黄色葡萄球菌检测率都高于护士的手电筒(16/17与14/23,分别为7 / 17/17,7/17年7月,7/17日)(P <0.05) 。此外,两种消毒剂都非常出色,其资格率没有显着差异(17/17与14/14)(p> 0.05)。结论:手电筒是NIS的潜在原因。消毒手电筒可能是一种有效和实用的感染控制方法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《国际护理科学(英文)》 |2017年第002期|P.169-172|共4页
  • 作者单位

    Guanghua School of Stomatology Hospital of Stomatology Sun Yat-Sen University Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology Guangzhou China;

    Guanghua School of Stomatology Hospital of Stomatology Sun Yat-Sen University Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology Guangzhou China;

    Department of Clinical Laboratory The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou China;

    Guanghua School of Stomatology Hospital of Stomatology Sun Yat-Sen University Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology Guangzhou China;

    Guanghua School of Stomatology Hospital of Stomatology Sun Yat-Sen University Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology Guangzhou China;

    Guanghua School of Stomatology Hospital of Stomatology Sun Yat-Sen University Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology Guangzhou China;

    Guanghua School of Stomatology Hospital of Stomatology Sun Yat-Sen University Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology Guangzhou China;

    Department of Clinical Laboratory The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 chi
  • 中图分类 肿瘤学;
  • 关键词

    Flashlights; Cross-contamination; Infection control; Disinfectant;

    机译:手电筒;交叉污染;感染控制;消毒剂;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 04:46:04
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号