首页> 外文期刊>国际护理科学(英文) >Competence of clinical teachers:A survey on perception of masters of nursing specialist postgraduates, their clinical teachers, and head nurses
【24h】

Competence of clinical teachers:A survey on perception of masters of nursing specialist postgraduates, their clinical teachers, and head nurses

机译:临床教师的能力:对护理专业研究生的硕士,临床教师和护士长的看法的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives:To explore the current admittance situation of clinical teachers for masters of nursing specialist(MNS)postgraduates and to test the competence of clinical teachers in self-evaluation and other evaluations.Methods:In this cross-sectional study,using a random number table,we chose 80 MNS postgraduates under clinical practice,their clinical teachers,and head nurses each from six hospitals in Hunan and Guangdong.The participants were tested on the basis of the Clinical Teachers''Competence Inventory of MNS Postgraduates.The competences of clinical teachers were evaluated by the three groups of participants.Results:The aggregated scores of teacher competence as evaluated by the MNS postgraduates(181.33±24.95)were lower than those assigned by both clinical teachers(190.75±24.30)and their head nurses(198.53±18.90),with significant differences in all dimensions except for clinical managing ability.The five highest rated items from all participants focused on the teachers''clinical nursing ability,and the five lowest rated items were mainly about their clinical research ability.Conclusion:The evaluation from MNS postgraduates is obviously lower than the self-evaluation of clinical teachers,and all participants are aware of the deficiency in research ability of the teachers.Thus,the admittance and examination of clinical teachers should be controlled strictly.Training should be carried out immediately to strengthen their comprehensive abilities,especially their research ability.
机译:目标:探讨护理专家大师(MNS)的临床教师的当前导航局面,并测试自我评估和其他评估中临床教师的能力。方法:在这个横断面研究中,使用随机数表,我们在临床实践中,他们的临床教师和前往湖南和广东省的六家医院的头部护士中选择了80个MNS的研究生。参与者在MNS研究生的临床教师普适库存的基础上进行了测试。临床教师的能力由三组参与者进行评估。结果:由MNS研究生评估的教师能力(181.33±24.95)评估的大学教师能力分别低于两种临床教师(190.75±24.30)及其头部护士(198.53±18.90) ),除了临床管理能力外,所有尺寸的差异都具有显着差异。来自所有参与者的五个最高评级项目专注于教师的临床护理能力,五个最低评级项目主要是其临床研究能力。结论:MNS研究生的评估明显低于临床教师的自我评估,所有参与者都意识到教师研究能力的缺陷.thus,应严格控制临床教师的入场和检查。应立即进行训练以加强其综合能力,特别是其研究能力。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号