This article deals with the politics of upgrading urbanized villages （UV） in the Pearl River Delta. In an environment of transition from a labor-oriented regional economy to higher value-added industries and with the ongoing reform processes, the Ioca（ governments try to fully integrate UV into their respective cities. This comprises an institutional reform making them part of the political and administrative hierarchies and a rather physical upgrading strategy intends to overcome urban problems associated with security, health, economic growth and real estate development. However, the customary strategy of comprehensive redevelopment seems no longer feasible. The cities of Guangzhou and Shenzhen therefore struggle to develop more sophisticated strategies to tackle the UV. The interesting aspects of the two case studies are the different approaches the two cities develop： Whereas Guangzhou tries to establish a piecemeal and rather reactive strategy somewhat taking the different local conditions into account, Shenzhen tries to pro-actively promote the diverse strengths and location factors of the UV. Both cities, however, gradually adapt their strategies to the respective local conditions that go far beyond mere bulldozing strategies featured prominently in the western media.%本文论述了珠江三角洲地区城中村升级的相关政策。在从一种劳动力指向型的区域经济向更高的增值工业转型的环境下和当前的改革进程中,各地方政府试图将城中村充分纳入其各自的城市体系中。这包含一种机制改革,它试图使部分的政策、行政等级以及一种比较实际的升级战略用来解决在治安、医疗、经济发展以及房地产开发等方面产生的城市问题。然而,综合改造的习惯性策略似乎已不再可行。因而在广州和深圳这样的城市尝试用更先进的战略来解决城中村问题。两个案例研究的切入点就是两个城市不同的发展过程：广州考虑到不同地区的条件,试图建立一种因地制宜的反馈型战略;而深圳在尝试积极主动地发挥城中村的多样化优势和地域优势。然而,两个城市都逐渐开始使其战略更加尊重本土现状,这就比在西方媒体上突出报道的推平重建战略更进一步了。
展开▼
