首页> 中文期刊>作物研究 >密集烤房不同装烟方式烘烤效益分析

密集烤房不同装烟方式烘烤效益分析

     

摘要

为探索现代烟草农业减工降本措施,采用梳式烟夹、装烟箱、散叶堆积、散叶小捆和常规烟竿5种装烟方式,对其装烟效率、烘烤成本及烤后烟叶经济性状进行了研究。结果表明,与常规烟竿相比,4种装烟方式劳动用工减少73.26%~82.44%,装烟量增加35.13%~50.63%,梳式烟夹、装烟箱和散叶小捆烘烤耗能成本低于常规烟竿,而散叶堆积烘烤能耗成本高于常规烟竿。4种装烟方式新增烤房设施增加投入回收时间为1.05~3.44年。在烤后烟叶经济性状方面,梳式烟夹装烟与常规烟竿基本相当,装烟箱、散叶堆积和散叶小捆略低。综合烤后烟叶的经济性状和能耗成本,以梳式烟夹装烟的效益最好。%In order to investigate the measures of saving labor force and energy during the development of tobacco agricul-tural modernization,the loading efficiency,energy cost and economic characters were studied using five loading methods:loading leaf with clip,loading with box,loose -leaf accumulation,loose -leaf wisp,and traditional loading leaf with pole. The results showed that four methods of loading leaf (loading leaf with clip,loading with box,loose -leaf accumulation, loose -leaf wisp)decreased the cost of labor force by 73.26% ~82.44%,and raised barn loading amount by 35.13% ~50.63% during curing when compared with the method of traditional loading leaf.The energy cost during curing of tradi-tional loading leaf with pole was higher than loading leaf with clip,loading with box,loose -leaf wisp but lower than loose-leaf accumulation.The time of invest recovery of new barn using four methods of loading leaf is 1.05 ~3.44 year/666.7m2 compared with the method of traditional loading leaf.The difference of the economic characters of curing leaves between loading leaf with clip and traditional loading leaf with pole was inconspicuous,while loading with box,loose -leaf accumulation and loose -leaf wisp were worse than traditional loading leaf with pole.The benefit of loading leaf with clip was the best considering both economic characters and energy cost.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号