Objective:To investigate the current status and trends of group counseling research in China by bibliometric analysis and content analysis.Method:Using methods of bibliometrics and content analysis,Chinese papers on group counseling in 1996 -2013 which were found in CNKI were analyzed in 6 aspects including litera-ture number,sources,research type,topic,quality and competence of group counselors.Results:A total number of 516 papers were found,in which 51.0% of journal articles and 49.0% of dissertations.The research methods and topics were developing from outcome and quantitative research to multiple methods and topics including process re-search,process-outcome research,qualitative research,combined research and theoretical research.The problems were that researchers were still focused on outcome research (92.6%)and quantitative research (54.5%).As to research quality,40.7% of journal articles were published on CSSCI,22.5% of the experimental studies had no control groups,among which 43.3% were not randomized or matched,and 75.5% of outcome researches had not traced long-term effects.In 65.4% of the researches,group leaders'qualifications were not described.Conclusion:The group counseling research in China is developed quite rapidly,and the research type and topic are more di-verse,but the quality of the studies needs to be improved,and the competence of group leaders needs to be exam-ined.%目的：采用文献计量和内容分析方法，探讨国内团体咨询研究的现状及发展趋势。方法：在中国知网数据库搜索1996－2013年间的团体咨询研究中文文献，从文献数量、文献来源分布、研究类型、研究主题、研究质量、团体领导者专业素质6方面进行分析。结果：共得到文献516篇，其中期刊文献占51.0％，学位论文占49.0％，文献数量逐年上升；从2000年前单一的效果研究和定量研究发展至过程研究、过程－效果研究、定性研究、定性定量结合、理论研究等多种类型和主题。研究主题集中于效果类研究（92.6％），以定量研究为主（54.5％）。研究质量方面，核心期刊论文占发表论文的40.7％，22.5％的实验研究未设立对照组，其中43.3％的研究没有或未说明采用随机或者匹配的方式分组，75.5％效果研究没有进行追踪；65.4％的文献未说明团体带领者的情况。结论：国内团体咨询研究呈快速发展阶段，研究类型及主题更为多样化，但研究质量亟待提高，团体领导者的专业素质仍待考量。
展开▼
