首页> 外文期刊>中华创伤杂志(英文版) >Outcome of posterior wall blowout in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)reconstruction via anteromedial portal approach: A retrospective research in 20 patients with 6 years follow-up
【24h】

Outcome of posterior wall blowout in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)reconstruction via anteromedial portal approach: A retrospective research in 20 patients with 6 years follow-up

机译:通过前内侧门入路重建前交叉韧带(ACL)后壁爆裂的结果:回顾性研究20例患者,随访6年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose:To evaluate the clinical outcome in patients who received anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)reconstruction via anteromedial portal with or without posterior wall blowout.Methods:Twenty patients with ruptured ACL,who have received ACL reconstruction via anteromedial portal between Apr 2012 and Oct 2013 were enrolled.According to the conditions of posterior wall,the patients were divided into 2 groups:posterior wall blowout group (10 patients) and posterior wall intact group (10 patients).The median follow up time were 63 (range 19 75) months and 60.5 (range 25-64)months in the 2 groups respectively.The clinical outcome was evaluated by knee joint physical examination,magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC)2000 subjective score,Lysholm score,Tenger score,difference of thigh circumference,KT-2000 and Biodex isokinetic dynamometer system.Results:No significant differences were found in terms of the IKDC score,Lysholm score,Tegner score,Lachman test positive rate or Pivot Shift test positive rate between the two groups.In KT-2000 and Biodex isokinetic dynamometer tests,the difference of muscle strength between affected knees and unaffected knees in posterior wall blowout group was not significant less than that of posterior wall intact group (p > 0.05).In addition,there is no statistical difference between the two groups in signaloise quotient (SNQ) of the graft (p > 0.05) in post operative MRI.Conclusion:Blowout of posterior wall in ACL reconstruction via anteromedial portal does not affect the clinical outcome as long as reliable fixation has been taken intraoperatively.
机译:目的:评估2012年4月至2013年10月之间通过前门韧带(ACL)通过前门韧带重建(有或无后壁爆裂)重建的患者的临床结果。方法:20例ACL破裂的患者,通过前门门重建。根据后壁的情况,​​将患者分为两组:后壁爆裂组(10例)和后壁完好组(10例)。中位随访时间为63个月(范围为19 75个月) 2组分别为60.5个月和60.5个月(范围为25-64个月)。通过膝关节体格检查,磁共振成像(MRI),国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)2000年主观评分,Lysholm评分,Tenger评分评估临床结局,大腿围,KT-2000和Biodex等速测功机系统的差异。结果:在IKDC评分,Lysholm评分,Tegner评分,L方面均无显着差异两组之间的achman测试阳性率或Pivot Shift测试阳性率。在KT-2000和Biodex等速测功机测试中,后壁爆裂组受影响的膝盖和未受影响的膝盖之间的肌肉力量差异不小于后壁。完整组(p> 0.05)。此外,术后MRI两组移植物的信噪比(SNQ)差异无统计学意义(p> 0.05)。结论:ACL重建后壁爆裂只要在术中已采取可靠的固定方法,经前内侧门就不会影响临床结果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《中华创伤杂志(英文版)》 |2019年第1期|24-28|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Institute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China;

    Orthopaedic Department, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China;

    Institute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 04:25:46
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号