首页> 外文期刊>中国海洋湖沼学报(英文版) >An improved dual-polarized ratio algorithm for sea ice concentration retrieval from passive microwave satellite data and inter-comparison with ASI, ABA and NT2
【24h】

An improved dual-polarized ratio algorithm for sea ice concentration retrieval from passive microwave satellite data and inter-comparison with ASI, ABA and NT2

机译:一种改进的双极化比率算法,用于从被动微波卫星数据中检索海冰浓度,并与ASI,ABA和NT2进行相互比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The dual-polarized ratio algorithm (DPR) for the retrieval of Arctic sea ice concentration from Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-EOS (AMSR-E) data was improved using a contrast ratio (CR) parameter.In contrast to three other algorithms (Artist Sea Ice algorithm,ASI;NASA-Team 2 algorithm,NT2;and AMSR-E Bootstrap algorithm,ABA),this algorithm does not use a series of tie-points or a priori values of brightness temperature of sea-ice constituents,such as open water and 100% sea ice.Instead,it is based on a ratio (α) of horizontally and vertically polarized sea ice emissivity at 36.5 GHz,which can be automatically determined by the CR.α exhibited a clear seasonal cycle:changing slowly during winter,rapidly at other times,and reaching a minimum during summer.The DPR was improved using a seasonal α.The systematic differences in the Arctic sea ice area over the complete AMSR-E period (2002-2011) were-0.8%±2.0% between the improved DPR and ASI;-1.3%+ 1.7% between the improved DPR and ABA;and-0.7°%±1.9% between the improved DPR and NT2.The improved DPR and ASI (or ABA) had small seasonal differences.The seasonal differences between the improved DPR and NT2 decreased,except in summer.The improved DPR identified extremely low ice concentration regions in the Pacific sector of the central Arctic (north of 83°N) around August 12,2010,which was confirmed by the Chinese National Arctic Research Expedition.A series of high-resolution MODIS images (250 m×250 m) of the Beaufort Sea during summer were used to assess the four algorithms.According to mean bias and standard deviations,the improved DPR algorithm performed equally well with the other three sea ice concentration algorithms.The improved DPR can provide reasonable sea ice concentration data,especially during summer.
机译:使用对比率(CR)参数改进了从高级微波扫描辐射仪-EOS(AMSR-E)数据中检索北极海冰浓度的双极化比率算法(DPR),与其他三种算法相比(Artist Sea) Ice算法(ASI),NASA-Team 2算法(NT2)和AMSR-E Bootstrap算法(ABA)),该算法不使用一系列结点或海冰成分的亮度温度先验值,例如开放度水和100%的海冰。它是基于CR在36.5 GHz处水平和垂直极化的海冰发射率之比(α)来确定的。α表现出明显的季节性周期:冬季变化缓慢,在其他时间迅速到达,并在夏季达到最小值。使用季节α提高了DPR。在整个AMSR-E期间(2002-2011年),北极海冰面积的系统差异为-0.8%±2.0% DPR和ASI改善之间;-DPR和ABA改善之间-1.3%+ 1.7% ;改良DPR和NT2之间的差异为-0.7°%±1.9%。改良DPR和ASI(或ABA)的季节差异较小。改良DPR和NT2之间的季节差异有所减小,夏季除外。 2010年8月12日左右,在中国中部北极研究中心证实了北极中部太平洋冰区(北纬83°N)低冰区。一系列高分辨率MODIS图像(250 m×250 m )在夏季使用了Beaufort Sea的)来评估这四种算法。根据平均偏差和标准差,改进的DPR算法与其他三种海冰浓度算法的效果一样好。改进的DPR可提供合理的海冰浓度数据,特别是在夏天。

著录项

  • 来源
    《中国海洋湖沼学报(英文版)》 |2018年第5期|1494-1508|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Institute of Oceanographic Instrumentation, Shandong Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266001, China;

    College of Physical and Environmental Oceanography, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China;

    College of Physical and Environmental Oceanography, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China;

    Institute of Oceanographic Instrumentation, Shandong Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266001, China;

    Institute of Oceanographic Instrumentation, Shandong Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266001, China;

    Institute of Oceanographic Instrumentation, Shandong Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266001, China;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号