目的：评价不同中医适宜技术包的推广效果，为技术包的改进提供科学依据。方法选取投入费用、专家人次数、高级职称人次数、专家下基层指导人次数、培训学时数、培训人次数、评价率和使用人数共8个评价指标，用 TOPSIS 法对5种中医适宜技术包在基层的推广效果进行综合评价。结果各适宜技术包的 Ci值分别是“颈肩腰腿痛”包0.76，“妇科疾病”包0.49，“小儿腹泻”包0.44，“慢性胃病”包0.66，“肿瘤疾病”包0.00。结论中医适宜技术包推广取得成效由高到低分别是“颈肩腰腿痛”包、“慢性胃病”包、“妇科疾病”包、“小儿腹泻”包和“肿瘤疾病”包。%Objective To evaluate the promotional effectiveness of different TCM appropriate technology packages; To provide a scientific basis for improving the technology package. Methods 8 assessment indexes, including input costs, the number of experts, the number of people with senior professional post, the number of grassroots people under the guidance of experts, the number of training hours, the number of people receiving training, evaluating rate and the number of users were selected. TOPSIS method was used to evaluate the promotional effectiveness of five kinds of TCM packages in grassroots. Results The Ci values for appropriate technology packages were 0.76 for pains in neck, shoulder, waist and lower extremities, 0.49 for gynecological diseases, 0.44 for infantile diarrhea, 0.66 for chronic gastropathy, and 0.00 for tumors. Conclusion The effectiveness of promotion of TCM appropriate technology packages from high to low is pains in neck, shoulder, waist and lower extremities package, chronic gastropathy package, gynecological diseases package, infantile diarrhea package, tumors package.
展开▼
