首页> 外文期刊>中国文献情报(英文刊) >On the framing of patent citations and academic paper citations in reflecting knowledge linkage: A discussion of the discrepancy of their divergent value-orientations
【24h】

On the framing of patent citations and academic paper citations in reflecting knowledge linkage: A discussion of the discrepancy of their divergent value-orientations

机译:反映知识联系的专利引文和学术论文引文的框架:讨论其不同价值取向的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

It has been widely recognized that academic paper citations will reflect scientific knowledge linkage.Patent citations are similar to academic paper citations in many aspects:Citation frequency distribution is often skewed;citation frequency varies from one subject field to another and authors'/inventors' preference for citing relevant literature is usually confined to their own native language.However,regardless of these seemingly similarities,the patent citation is unique and special.It is constructed by incorporating information providers from multiple sources,such as from examiners,inventors,attomeys and/or the public.It is driven by a value-orientation for the monopolization of market production under regulations of Patent Laws.It is also practiced under the sway of an industrial culture embedded with a notion of "creative destruction".In view of the contextual complexities of patent citations,simply applying the data criteria and citation behavior analysis of academic paper citations to that of patentbibliometdcs for the purpose of reflecting knowledge linkage is both conceptually and technically illogical and unreasonable.This paper attempts to delve into the issue of the currently misconceived assertions and practice about "transplanting" the methodology of academic paper citations en masse indiscriminately into the practice of patent citations.It is hoped that such a study would yield improved result stemming from the practice of patent citations for reflecting knowledge linkage in the future.
机译:众所周知,学术论文的引用将反映科学知识的联系。专利的引用在许多方面与学术论文的引用相似:引用频率的分布经常偏斜;引用频率从一个学科领域到另一个学科而变化,并且作者/发明人的偏爱引用相关文献通常仅限于他们自己的母语。但是,尽管有这些看似相似的地方,但专利引用却是独特而特殊的。它是通过整合来自多个来源的信息提供者(例如来自审查员,发明者,躯体和/或它是由专利法规定的市场生产垄断的价值取向驱动的。它也是在嵌有“创造性破坏”概念的工业文化的控制下实践的。专利引用的复杂性,只需应用数据标准和学术论文引用的引用行为分析旨在反映知识联系的专利文献的概念在技术上和技术上都是不合逻辑的,也是不合理的。希望这样的研究能够从专利引证的实践中获得更好的结果,以反映未来的知识联系。

著录项

  • 来源
    《中国文献情报(英文刊)》 |2010年第003期|37-45|共9页
  • 作者

    LI Rui; MENG Liansheng;

  • 作者单位

    Sichuan University, School of Public Administration, Chengdu 610064, China;

    Library of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China;

    Library of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:36:01
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号