首页> 外文期刊>中国文献情报:英文版 >A comparative analysis of information literacy curriculum standards in the educational programs of high schools in China and in the United States
【24h】

A comparative analysis of information literacy curriculum standards in the educational programs of high schools in China and in the United States

机译:中美两国高中教育计划中信息素养课程标准的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Our study aims to take a closer look at China’s current information literacy(IL)program standards at secondary schools and to analyze their level of success and/or failures in a comparative way with those of the United States in terms of fulfilling their each other’s mission-oriented mandates.Our research findings show that China’s current IL standards of high schools contain a disproportionate emphasis on information technology(IT).Moreover,the stipulations of these IL standards are narrowly construed and without being solidly grounded on a broad and comprehensive educational perspective.We also suggest that there are two underlying causes for this set of unsound IL standards in China.Firstly,there is a lack of collaboration between two major competing forces engaged in the curricular development and research of IL in China:Those professionals in educational IT discipline vis-à-vis those in Library and Information Science.Secondly,library professionals have a very limited influence on major socio-cultural policies,even at their own institutions.As a result,this paper recommends the following three possible measures,which may help remedy this situation strategically:1)Establishing a set of new IL curriculum standards based on an IL-centered educational perspective;2)establishing a teacher-librarian’s training program to promote school librarians’role in IL education;and 3)strengthening the research and development of an online IL education program and an accompanied evaluation mechanism.
机译:我们的研究旨在更深入地了解中国目前在中学的信息素养(IL)计划标准,并以与美国相比的方式比较它们在完成彼此任务方面的成功和/或失败水平。我们的研究结果表明,中国当前的高中IL标准对信息技术(IT)的重视程度过高。此外,这些IL标准的规定狭义地解释且没有扎实地基于广泛而全面的教育视角我们还建议,在中国,这套不完善的IL标准存在两个根本原因。首先,中国IL的课程开发和研究的两个主要竞争力量之间缺乏协作:那些教育IT专业人员相对于图书馆和信息科学的学科。其次,图书馆专业人员对图书馆和信息科学的影响非常有限。因此,本文提出了以下三种可能的措施,这些措施可能有助于从战略上纠正这种情况:1)基于以IL为中心的教育,建立一套新的IL课程标准观点; 2)建立教师图书馆员的培训计划,以提高学校图书馆员在IL教育中的作用;以及3)加强在线IL教育计划的研究与开发以及相应的评估机制。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号