首页> 外文期刊>中国城市与环境研究(英文版) >International Governance on Carbon Tariff and Its Vacuum in International Regime
【24h】

International Governance on Carbon Tariff and Its Vacuum in International Regime

机译:碳关税国际治理及其国际制度中的真空

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Drawing on the idea that countries are eligible to implement differentiated emission reduction policies based on their respective capabilities,some parties of UNFCCC attempt to weaken the principle of "Common but differentiated responsibilities(CBDR)" and impose carbon tariff on international trade.This initiative is in fact another camouflage to burden developing countries with emission cut obligation,which has no doubt undermined the development rights of developing countries.This paper defines Carbon Tariff as border measures that target import goods with embodied carbon emission.It can be import tariffs or other domestic tax measures that adjust border tax,which includes plain import tariffs and export rebates,border tax adjustment,emission quota and permit etc.For some developed countries,carbon tariffs mean to sever trade protectionism and to build trade barriers.Its theoretical arguments like "loss of comparative advantage","carbon leakage decreases environmental effectiveness" and "theoretical model bases" are pseudo-propositions without international consensus.Carbon tariff has become an intensively debated issue due to its duality of climate change and trade,but neither UNFCCC nor WTO has clarified this issue or has indicated a clear statement in this regard.As a result,it allows some parties to take advantage of this loophole and escape its international climate change obligation.Carbon tariff is an issue arising from global climate governance.To promote the cooperation of global climate governance and safeguard the social and economic development of developing countries,a fair and justified climate change regime and international trade institution should be established,and the settlement of the carbon tariff issue should be addressed within these frameworks.This paper argues that the international governance of carbon tariff should in cooperation with other international agreements;however,principles and guidelines regarding this issue should be developed under the UNFCCC.Based on these principles and guidelines,WTO can develop related technical operation provisions.
机译:借鉴各国有资格根据各自的能力实施差别化的减排政策的想法,UNFCCC的一些党派试图削弱“共同但有区别的责任(CBDR)”的原则,并对国际贸易征收碳关税。实际上,另一种伪装使发展中国家承担了减排义务,这无疑损害了发展中国家的发展权。本文将碳关税定义为针对具有隐性碳排放的进口商品的边境措施。它可以是进口关税或其他国内关税。调整边境税的税收措施,包括简单的进口关税和出口退税,边境税调整,排放配额和许可证等。对于某些发达国家,碳关税意味着切断贸易保护主义并建立贸易壁垒。比较优势”,“碳泄漏降低了环境效益”碳关税由于其气候变化和贸易的双重性而成为备受争议的问题,但《联合国气候变化框架公约》和世贸组织均未对此问题进行澄清或对此发表明确声明。因此,它使某些方面能够利用这一漏洞,逃避其承担的国际气候变化义务。碳关税是全球气候治理中产生的一个问题。发展中国家,应建立公平合理的气候变化制度和国际贸易机构,并在这些框架内解决碳关税问题。本文认为,碳关税的国际治理应与其他国际协议合作;但是,应制定有关此问题的原理和准则d根据《联合国气候变化框架公约》。世界贸易组织可根据这些原则和准则制定相关的技术操作规定。

著录项

  • 来源
    《中国城市与环境研究(英文版)》 |2013年第1期|117-125|共9页
  • 作者

    WANG Mou;

  • 作者单位

    Institute for Urban and Environmental Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Zhongye Building, Shuguangxili 28, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100028, China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号