对比商环包皮环切术与剪刀法包皮环切术的临床研究

摘要

Objective To study and analyze the operation effect of Shang ring circumcision and scissors circumcision. Methods 208 patients accepted the Shang ring circumcision were the experimental group,and 120 patients accepted scissors circumcision were the control group in our hospital from 2011 to 2013. And to analyzed the clinical operation treatment in these patients and to clinical operation treatment in these patients. Results The operation time, postoperative pain and operation hemorrhage in the experimental group were excel ent than these in the control group(P<0.05). Rates of incision edge edema,chalaza crosses short and adverse reaction in the experimental group were lower than these in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion The Shang ring circumcision although need long healing time,the high cost of operation,but it has the neat operation incision,short operation time, good hemostatic effect and low adverse reaction.%目的：研究分析商环包皮环切术与剪刀法包皮环切术的临床疗效效果。方法选择2011～2013年我院接收的208例接受商环包皮环切术患者作为实验组，120例剪刀法包皮环切术患者作为对照组，对这些患者的临床手术治疗情况进行对比分析，探讨手术效果。结果实验组患者手术时间、术后疼痛、手术出血等情况优于常规手术患者，P<0.05。实验组患者切口边缘水肿和系带过短的发生率低于对照组，不良反应发生率也低于对照组，P<0.05。结论商环包皮环切术虽然愈合时间长，手术费用高，但是手术切口整齐，手术时间短，止血效果好，不良反应率低。