首页> 外文期刊>亚洲男性学杂志(英文版) >The PCA3 test for guiding repeat biopsy of prostate cancer and its cut-off score:a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

The PCA3 test for guiding repeat biopsy of prostate cancer and its cut-off score:a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:PCA3检验指导前列腺癌的重复活检及其临界值:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The speciifcity of prostate-speciifc antigen (PSA) for early intervention in repeat biopsy is unsatisfactory. Prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) may be more accurate in outcome prediction than other methods for the early detection of prostate cancer (PCa). However, the results were inconsistent in repeated biopsies. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of PCA3 in outcome prediction. A systematic bibliographic search was conducted for articles published before April 2013, using PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Embase and other databases from health technology assessment agencies. The quality of the studies was assessed on the basis of QUADAS criteria. Eleven studies of diagnostic tests with moderate to high quality were selected. A meta-analysis was carried out to synthesize the results. The results of the meta-analyses were heterogeneous among studies. We performed a subgroup analysis (with or without inclusion of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP)). Using a PCA3 cutoff of 20 or 35, in the two sub-groups, the global sensitivity values were 0.93 or 0.80 and 0.79 or 0.75, speciifcities were 0.65 or 0.44 and 0.78 or 0.70, positive likelihood ratios were 1.86 or 1.58 and 2.49 or 1.78, negative likelihood ratios were 0.81 or 0.43 and 0.91 or 0.82 and diagnostic odd ratios (ORs) were 5.73 or 3.45 and 7.13 or 4.11, respectively. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.85 or 0.72 and 0.81 or 0.69, respectively. PCA3 can be used for repeat biopsy of the prostate to improve accuracy of PCa detection. Unnecessary biopsies can be avoided by using a PCa cutoff score of 20.
机译:前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)在重复活检的早期干预的原型是不令人满意的。前列腺癌抗原3(PCA3)在结果预测中可能更准确地比其他前列腺癌(PCA)的其他方法更准确。然而,结果在反复活组织检查中不一致。因此,我们进行了系统审查和荟萃分析,以评估PCA3在结果预测中的作用。在2013年4月之前发布的文章进行了系统的书目搜索,使用了来自健康技术评估机构的PubMed,Medline,Science和其他数据库。在Quadas标准的基础上评估研究质量。选择了中度至高质量的诊断测试的11研究。进行META分析以合成结果。荟萃分析的结果在研究中是异质的。我们进行了亚组分析(有或没有包含高级前列腺上皮内瘤瘤(HGGPin)和非典型小缩醛增殖(尽快))。在两个子组中使用20或35的PCA3截止值,全局灵敏度值为0.93或0.80,0.79或0.75,种本为0.65或0.44和0.78或0.70,阳性似然比为1.86或1.58和2.49或1.78 ,负似然比为0.81或0.43和0.91或0.82,诊断奇数比例分别为5.73或3.45和7.13或4.11。总结接收器操作特征曲线的曲线(AUC)下的区域分别为0.85或0.72和0.81或0.69。 PCA3可用于前列腺的重复活检,以提高PCA检测的准确性。通过使用20的PCA截止得分,可以避免不必要的活组织检查。

著录项

  • 来源
    《亚洲男性学杂志(英文版)》 |2014年第3期|487-492|共6页
  • 作者单位

    The First Afifliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China;

    The First Afifliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China;

    The First Afifliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China;

    The First Afifliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号