首页> 外文期刊>亚太生殖杂志(英文版) >Effect of double cleavage stage versus sequential cleavage and blastocyst stage embryo transfer on clinical pregnancy rates
【24h】

Effect of double cleavage stage versus sequential cleavage and blastocyst stage embryo transfer on clinical pregnancy rates

机译:双卵裂期与顺序卵裂期和囊胚期胚胎移植对临床妊娠率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective:To compare clinical pregnancy rates following sequential day-3 and day-5 embryo transfer with double or sequential cleavage-stage transfers.Methods:This study enrolled 242 patients undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol and fresh embryo transfer.Basal follicle stimulating hormone,luteinizing hormone,serum estradiol and anti-Müllerian hormone levels and controlled ovarian stimulation outcomes were noted.Of 242 women,135 underwent double embryo transfer on day 2 or day 3(the double group),54 women underwent sequential embryo transfer on day 2 and day 3(the D2/D3 group),and 53 underwent sequential embryo transfer on day 3 and day 5(the D3/D5 group).Clinical pregnancy rates were compared among the groups.Results:Female age,body mass index,basal follicle stimulating hormone,luteinizing hormone and estradiol levels were similar among the groups(P>0.05).The D3/D5 group had a significantly higher number of metaphaseⅡoocytes,fertilized oocytes and good quality embryos on day 3 compared with the double group and the D2/D3 group(P<0.001).Clinical pregnancy rates in the double,D2/D3 and D3/D5 groups were 26.6%(36/135),16.6%(9/54)and 37.7%(20/53),respectively.There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rates between the double group and the D2/D3 group(P=0.204)or the D3/D5 group(P=0.188).The D3/D5 group had significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates compared with the D2/D3 group(P=0.025).Conclusions:Sequential cleavage-stage transfer(D2/D3)or cleavage stage and blastocyst transfer(D3/D5)does not improve clinical pregnancy rates compared with double cleavage-stage embryo transfer.Although sequential transfer seems to be an effective option in certain patient populations,routine application of this technique might not be a suitable approach in an unselected population to improve assisted reproductive technology outcomes.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号