首页> 外文期刊>动物营养:英文版 >Performance of broiler chickens offered nutritionally-equivalent diets based on two red grain sorghums with quantified kafirin concentrations as intact pellets or re-ground mash following steam-pelleting at65 or 97℃ conditioning temperatures
【24h】

Performance of broiler chickens offered nutritionally-equivalent diets based on two red grain sorghums with quantified kafirin concentrations as intact pellets or re-ground mash following steam-pelleting at65 or 97℃ conditioning temperatures

机译:肉鸡的营养性能基于两种红色谷物高粱,其定量的kafirin浓度为完整的颗粒或在65或97℃的调节温度下进行蒸汽造粒后重新磨碎,提供了与营养相当的日粮

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Liverpool Plains is a fertile agricultural region in New South Wales, Australia. Two sorghums from the2009 Liverpool Plains harvest, sorghums #3 and #5, were extensively characterised which included concentrations of kafirin and phenolic compounds plus rapid visco-analysis(RVA) starch pasting profiles. Diets based on these two sorghums were formulated to be iso-nitrogenous and iso-energetic and were offered to male Ross 308 broiler chicks from 7 to 28 days post–hatch as either intact pellets or reground mash following steam-pelleting at conditioning temperatures of either 65 or 97°C. Thus the feeding study consisted of a 2×2×2 factorial array of dietary treatments: two sorghum varieties, two feed forms and two conditioning temperatures. Each of the eight treatments was replicated six times with six birds per replicate cage.Assessed parameters included growth performance, nutrient utilisation, apparent starch and protein(N) digestibility coefficients and disappearance rates from the distal jejunum and distal ileum. Intact pellets supported higher(P <0.001) feed intakes and weight gains by 9.83 and 9.08%, respectively, than reground mash diets. Feed conversion ratios of broilers offered diets steam-conditioned at 97°C were 2.46% inferior(P <0.001) in comparison to 65°C diets and both apparent metabolizable energy(AME) and N-corrected AME(AMEn) were compromised. Broilers offered sorghum #3-based diets significantly(P <0.001) outperformed their sorghum #5 counterparts in terms of weight gain by 3.75%(1,334 versus 1,223 g/bird), FCR by 4.81%(1.524 versus 1.601), AME by 1.06 MJ(13.61 versus 12.55 MJ/kg), ME:GE ratio(ME:GE) by 4.81%(0.806 versus0.769) and AMEn by 1.03 MJ(12.38 versus 11.35 MJ/kg). The inferiority of sorghum #5 appeared to be associated with higher concentrations of kafirin(61.5 versus 50.7 g/kg) and conjugated phenolic acids,including ferulic acid(31.1 versus 25.6 mg/g). There were no significant differences in jejunal and ileal starch and protein(N) digestibility coefficients between the two sorghums. However, starch to protein(N) disappearance rate ratios from the distal jejunum were significantly(P <0.001) correlated with ME:GE and AME. The multiple linear regression equations indicated that energy utilisation was enhanced by coupling rapidly digestible protein with slowly digestible starch, which suggests that bilateral bioavailability of starch and protein is pivotal to efficient energy utilisation.
机译:利物浦平原是澳大利亚新南威尔士州一个肥沃的农业地区。对2009年利物浦平原高粱中的两种高粱进行了广泛的表征,即高粱3号和5号,其中包括kafirin和酚类化合物的浓度,以及快速黏度分析(RVA)淀粉糊化曲线。基于这两种高粱的日粮经配制为等氮和等能的,并在孵化后7至28天提供给雄性Ross 308肉仔鸡,以完整的颗粒或捣碎的马铃薯泥在条件温度下进行蒸汽造粒65或97°C。因此,喂养研究由2×2×2阶乘饮食处理组成:两种高粱品种,两种饲料形式和两种调节温度。八种处理方法中的每一种均重复六次,每个复制笼中有六只鸟。评估参数包括生长性能,养分利用,表观淀粉和蛋白质(N)消化系数以及空肠远端和回肠远端的消失率。与碾碎的supported饲料相比,完整的颗粒饲料分别可提高饲料摄入量(P <0.001)和增重9.83和9.08%。与65°C日粮相比,在97°C蒸汽条件下饲喂的肉鸡的饲料转化率低(2.46%)(P <0.001),并且表观代谢能(AME)和经N校正的AME(AMEn)均受到损害。肉鸡提供的基于高粱3号的日粮(P <0.001)在体重增加方面显着优于其5号高粱(3.73%(1,334对1,223克/只),FCR达到4.81%(1.524对1.601),AME达到1.06) MJ(13.61对12.55 MJ / kg),ME:GE比(ME:GE)为4.81%(0.806对0.769)和AMEn为1.03 MJ(12.38对11.35 MJ / kg)。高粱#5的劣质似乎与高浓度的kafirin(61.5对50.7 g / kg)和共轭酚酸包括阿魏酸(31.1对25.6 mg / g)有关。两个高粱之间的空肠和回肠淀粉以及蛋白质(N)消化率系数无显着差异。空肠远端淀粉与蛋白质(N)的消失率比与ME:GE和AME显着相关(P <0.001)。多元线性回归方程表明,通过将快速消化的蛋白质与缓慢消化的淀粉偶联可以提高能量利用率,这表明淀粉和蛋白质的双向生物利用度对于有效利用能量至关重要。

著录项

  • 来源
    《动物营养:英文版》 |2015年第3期|P.220-228|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Poultry Research Foundation within the Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney;

    Australian Poultry CRC, University of New England;

    Australian Proteome Analysis Facility, Macquarie University;

    Department of Plant and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney;

    Poultry Research Foundation within the Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney;

    Australian Poultry CRC, University of New England;

    Australian Proteome Analysis Facility, Macquarie University;

    Department of Plant and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney;

    Poultry Research Foundation within the Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney;

    Australian Poultry CRC, University of New England;

    Australian Proteome Analysis Facility, Macquarie University;

    Department of Plant and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney;

    Poultry Research Foundation within the Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney;

    Australian Poultry CRC, University of New England;

    Australian Proteome Analysis Facility, Macquarie University;

    Department of Plant and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney;

    Poultry Research Foundation within the Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney;

    Australian Poultry CRC, University of New England;

    Australian Proteome Analysis Facility, Macquarie University;

    Department of Plant and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney;

    Poultry Research Foundation within the Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney;

    Australian Poultry CRC, University of New England;

    Australian Proteome Analysis Facility, Macquarie University;

    Department of Plant and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney;

    Poultry Research Foundation within the Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney;

    Australian Poultry CRC, University of New England;

    Australian Proteome Analysis Facility, Macquarie University;

    Department of Plant and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 CHI
  • 中图分类 饲料与营养;
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号