首页> 外文学位 >Needle Exchange Programs to Prevent Hepatitis C Virus Infection in People Who Inject Drugs in Rural Appalachia
【24h】

Needle Exchange Programs to Prevent Hepatitis C Virus Infection in People Who Inject Drugs in Rural Appalachia

机译:针头交换计划,以防止在农村阿巴拉契亚注射毒品的人中感染丙型肝炎病毒

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The recent opioid epidemic in the rural Appalachian region of the United States has fueled an exponential increase in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among People Who Inject Drugs (PWID). Needle exchange programs (NEP), which provide clean needles in exchange for used needles, can reduce the incidence of HCV among PWIDs. However, the empirical evidence examining NEP effectiveness in the prevention of HCV in this population is mixed, only describes studies conducted in urban areas, and does not address the unique challenges associated with implementing NEPs in rural areas. Furthermore, no studies have examined barriers to using clean needles obtained from NEPs in rural settings. Therefore, there is a critical need to understand the unique context and programmatic challenges of rural NEPs to design and implement successful programs to reduce HCV transmission in this underserved population. The objective of this dissertation was to improve empirical evidence related to NEP efficacy, examine programmatic challenges encountered by rural NEPs, and identify clean needle use barriers unique to rural areas. The rationale underlying this research is that improved understanding of operational and clean needle use barriers will promote successful implementation of NEPs in rural areas. In the first study, a systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted to update the empirical evidence related to NEP prevention of HCV in PWIDs. Findings from this study revealed that the overall impact of NEPs on HCV prevention remains unclear and is complicated by significant heterogeneity between studies. Furthermore, no rural studies were identified in the review. Standardization of population characteristics, intervention components, empirical comparisons, and outcome assessments is suggested to reduce heterogeneity and clarify the empirical contribution of NEPs to HCV prevention. In the second study, a qualitative case study design was employed to examine barriers and facilitators to NEP implementation, ongoing operations, and future sustainability. Structured interviews with program directors, law enforcement leaders and personnel, and NEP attendees revealed common barriers and facilitators to program operations. Findings from this study indicated that despite broad community support, growing volumes, funding shortages, and the federal government's prohibition on the use of funds to purchase needles threatened program operations. Furthermore, paraphernalia laws created a legal conundrum in the form of criminal sanctions for the possession of needles, which may inadvertently promote needle sharing and disease transmission. In the third study, a mixed methods survey of PWIDs attending two rural, Appalachian programs regarding barriers to using clean needles obtained from the exchange for every injection was employed. Findings from this study revealed that fear of arrest and problems with obtaining clean needles from pharmacies were the most commonly endorsed barriers to clean needle use. The results of this dissertation suggest that NEPs opened in rural Central Appalachia in response to an opioid and heroin epidemic have enjoyed robust community support and are viewed as an important infectious diseases prevention mechanism by PWIDs. However, the overall impact of NEPs on preventing HCV in rural PWIDs is unclear and, similar to urban areas of the United States, may be blunted by legal structural influences (i.e. paraphernalia laws) that impact policing behaviors. Future studies should explore the factors associated with these structural barriers that may prevent the ability of rural PWIDs to use a clean needle during every injection, which, in turn, may minimize the overall efficacy of these programs on HCV prevention. Further research is also needed on the feasibility of implementing the addition of opiate replacement therapy (i.e., methadone, buprenorphine) with NEPs given the strong protective effect on HCV seroconversion observed in several European studies implementing this combined approach consistently over time.
机译:最近在美国阿巴拉契亚州农村地区的阿片类药物流行使注射毒品者(PWID)中的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染呈指数增长。针头交换程序(NEP)可提供干净的针头来交换用过的针头,可以减少PWID中HCV的发生率。但是,检验NEP预防该人群HCV有效性的经验证据好坏参半,仅描述了在城市地区进行的研究,并未解决与在农村地区实施NEP相关的独特挑战。此外,没有研究检查过在农村地区使用从NEP获得的清洁针头的障碍。因此,迫切需要了解农村NEP的独特背景和计划挑战,以设计和实施成功的计划,以减少这一服务水平低下人群的HCV传播。本文的目的是改善与NEP功效相关的经验证据,研究农村NEP遇到的程序性挑战,并确定农村地区独有的清洁针头使用障碍。该研究的基本原理是,对操作和清洁针头使用障碍的了解将促进农村地区NEP的成功实施。在第一项研究中,进行了荟萃分析的系统评价,以更新与NEP预防PWIDs中的HCV有关的经验证据。这项研究的发现表明,NEPs对HCV预防的总体影响尚不清楚,并且因研究之间的显着异质性而变得复杂。此外,该评价未发现任何农村研究。建议对人群特征,干预成分,经验比较和结果评估进行标准化,以减少异质性,并阐明NEP对HCV预防的经验贡献。在第二项研究中,采用了定性案例研究设计,以检查阻碍NEP实施,正在进行的运营和未来可持续性的障碍和促进因素。与计划主管,执法领导者和人员以及NEP参与者进行的结构化访谈揭示了计划运营的常见障碍和促进者。这项研究的结果表明,尽管得到了社区的广泛支持,但是数量不断增加,资金短缺以及联邦政府禁止使用资金购买针头的行为威胁到了计划的运作。此外,用具法律以藏有针具的刑事制裁形式造成了法律难题,这可能无意间促进了针具共享和疾病传播。在第三项研究中,对参加两个农村阿巴拉契亚计划的PWID进行了混合方法调查,涉及使用每次注射从交易所获得的干净针头的障碍。这项研究的结果表明,担心被捕和从药店获得干净的针头的问题是最常使用的清洁针头障碍。本文的结果表明,针对阿片类药物和海洛因的流行,在中部阿巴拉契亚地区农村地区开设的NEPs得到了社区的大力支持,被PWIDs视为重要的传染病预防机制。但是,NEP对预防农村PWID中的HCV的总体影响尚不清楚,并且类似于美国的城市地区,可能会受到影响治安行为的法律结构影响(即用具法)的影响。未来的研究应探讨与这些结构性障碍相关的因素,这些因素可能会阻止农村PWID在每次注射过程中使用干净的针头的能力,从而可能使这些预防HCV计划的总体效果降至最低。考虑到在一些欧洲研究中观察到的对HCV血清转化的强保护作用,随着时间的推移,该研究持续不断地进行,因此有必要对NEPs实施阿片替代治疗(即美沙酮,丁丙诺啡)进行进一步的可行性研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Davis, Stephen M.;

  • 作者单位

    West Virginia University.;

  • 授予单位 West Virginia University.;
  • 学科 Public health.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 124 p.
  • 总页数 124
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号