首页> 外文学位 >Forging private governance of climate change: The power and politics of socially responsible investment.
【24h】

Forging private governance of climate change: The power and politics of socially responsible investment.

机译:建立气候变化的私人治理:对社会负责的投资的权力和政治。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

How and why do private governance arrangements originate in world politics and what role do financial actors and instruments have in this process? The following study attempts to answer this by exploring the emerging global governance of climate change involving (exclusively or primarily) non-state actors, i.e. organized amongst elements of business and/or civil society. Scholars are only now beginning to address questions of private governance that they have been asking of international public governance mechanisms for years: How do they originate? Who are the key actors in these and what power do they have and how is it exercised? What role, if any, does the state have in their development? What are their characteristics, the differences amongst them? To what extent are they effective? The study argues that a key impetus to the creation and dissemination of these mechanisms is the financial sector and specifically the growing global phenomenon of socially responsible investment (SRI), which increasingly has designs on re-defining the social responsibility of corporations, including the impact of business behavior on the environment. It explores how the rise of SRI has resulted in the emergence of a number of what I call 'investor-driven governance mechanisms' (IDGMs) concerned with the problem of global warming; these share a central actor--- institutional investors---but exhibit varying characteristics, including the extent of involvement by civil society organizations and the extent to which their creation and effectiveness are affected by the actions of public authority (states and intergovernmental agencies). Three case studies of IDGMs are evaluated in order to test hypotheses concerning their creation and development. The conclusions of this research strongly suggest that without the continued pressure and active participation of civil society in investor-led private governance arrangements, or without governments enacting legislation to strengthen corporate governance and related standards, the future of IDGMs are likely to be only as a marginal influence in addressing the problem of climate change.
机译:私人治理安排如何以及为什么起源于世界政治,金融参与者和工具在此过程中起什么作用?以下研究试图通过探索新兴的全球气候变化治理来解决这个问题,这种治理涉及(排他或主要)非国家行为者,即组织在企业和/或民间社会中的人。学者们才刚刚开始解决多年来一直在问国际公共治理机制的私人治理问题:它们是如何产生的?谁是其中的关键角色,他们拥有什么权力以及如何行使权力?国家在其发展中起什么作用(如果有的话)?它们的特点是什么,它们之间的区别是什么?它们在多大程度上有效?该研究认为,建立和传播这些机制的主要动力是金融部门,尤其是日益增长的全球社会责任投资现象(SRI),这种现象越来越多地旨在重新定义公司的社会责任,包括影响。行为对环境的影响。它探讨了SRI的崛起如何导致出现了许多我所谓的与全球变暖问题有关的“投资者驱动的治理机制”(IDGM);它们共享一个中央参与者-机构投资者-但表现出不同的特征,包括民间社会组织的参与程度以及公共权力机构(国家和政府间机构)的行动对其创造和效力的影响程度。对IDGM的三个案例研究进行了评估,以检验有关其创建和发展的假设。该研究的结论有力地表明,如果没有民间社会的持续压力和积极参与以投资者为主导的私人治理安排,或者没有政府颁布立法来加强公司治理和相关标准,IDGM的未来可能仅仅是解决气候变化问题的边际影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    MacLeod, Michael R.;

  • 作者单位

    The George Washington University.;

  • 授予单位 The George Washington University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.;Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 207 p.
  • 总页数 207
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号