首页> 外文学位 >Military rule and democracy in Greece and Turkey.
【24h】

Military rule and democracy in Greece and Turkey.

机译:希腊和土耳其的军事统治和民主。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

What were the causes of various types of regimes and their consolidation in Greece and Turkey? Why did the Greek and Turkish armed forces intervene in politics via short-lived coup d'etats and establish or support authoritarian regimes during various periods in their histories? Results from archival research and interviews with more than 110 Greek and Turkish businessmen, politicians, and military officers suggest that political regimes and military interventions in Greece and Turkey were determined by the power of the elites relative to the opposition and the degree of threat that the elites perceived to their interests. Consolidated authoritarian regimes (Turkey 1931-1946, Greece 1936-1941) occurred when the majority of political, economic, and military elites perceived high levels of threat to their interests from the lower classes. These elites formed alliances in support of the creation or sustaining of an authoritarian regime. Unconsolidated democracies with short-lived military coup d'etats (Greece 1843-1936, Turkey 1950-1983) came about when the military, political, and economic elites were threatened by each other. Successful coups in unconsolidated democracies (Greece 1909, Turkey 1980) took place when the military initiated the coup in coalition with a section of the elites. Unsuccessful coup attempts (Greece 1933, 1935, Turkey 1962, 1963) occurred when the insurgents were not supported by the elites and the rest of the military. Unconsolidated authoritarian regimes (Greece 1967-1974, Turkey 1923-1930) differed from their consolidated counterparts by the level of support they garnered. In these authoritarian regimes, a faction of the military and/or the political elite perceived threats to their interests from the electorate and established a repressive regime. However, (other) political elites had pro-democratic regime preferences, and therefore, opposed authoritarianism. Similarly, a significant portion of the lower classes engaged in contentious action. Consolidated democracy in Greece after 1981 emerged when political, economic, and military elite groups did not perceive threats to their interests from the lower classes or from each other. Additionally, interventionist military cliques did not have sufficient power to repress the opposition and could not gain support within the armed forces and among other elite groups.
机译:希腊和土耳其的各种政权及其巩固的原因是什么?为什么希腊和土耳其军队在历史上的各个时期通过短暂的政变干预政治并建立或支持独裁政权?档案研究的结果以及对110多个希腊和土耳其商人,政客和军官的采访表明,希腊和土耳其的政治政权和军事干预是由相对于反对派的精英力量和威胁程度决定的。精英们意识到了他们的利益。合并的威权政权(土耳其1931-1946年,希腊1936-1941年)是在大多数政治,经济和军事精英意识到下层阶级对其自身利益的高度威胁时发生的。这些精英组成联盟,支持建立或维持威权政权。当军事,政治和经济精英相互威胁时,出现了短暂的军事政变(民主1843-1936,土耳其1950-1983)的不巩固民主政体。当军队与部分精英联盟发动政变时,在未合并的民主国家中成功进行了政变(希腊1909年,土耳其1980年)。当叛乱分子没有得到精英和其他军队的支持时,政变企图失败(希腊1933年,1935年,土耳其1962年,1963年)。未合并的威权政体(希腊1967-1974年,土耳其1923-1930年)与巩固的威权政体在获得支持的程度上有所不同。在这些威权政权中,一个军队和/或政治精英的派系认为选民对其利益有威胁,并建立了压制性政权。但是,(其他)政治精英有亲民主政权的偏好,因此反对专制主义。同样,下层阶级的很大一部分人也参与了诉讼。 1981年之后,希腊的巩固民主出现了,当时政治,经济和军事精英团体并未意识到下层阶级或彼此之间对其利益的威胁。此外,干预主义军事集团没有足够的力量镇压反对派,也无法在武装部队和其他精英团体中获得支持。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Virginia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Virginia.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; History Military.; Military Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 761 p.
  • 总页数 761
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号