首页> 外文学位 >Understanding community: The implications of information flow and social interactions in online discussion groups.
【24h】

Understanding community: The implications of information flow and social interactions in online discussion groups.

机译:了解社区:在线讨论组中信息流和社交互动的含义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

An increasingly difficult challenge that users of online communities face is how to assess the quality and trustworthiness of content generated by strangers. This is especially true in help and support question-answer newsgroups where little information is displayed in the interface to show an authors' status or reputation within a group or their past behavior in online discussion environments in general. Moreover, different users of online discussion groups behave and interact with information in differing ways.;This dissertation investigates the behaviors that are manifested through various social types when they interact with others in online discussion groups. Mixed methods were employed to ensure the rigor of the research, including (1) segmentation of newsgroup posting behavior by aggregate newsgroups and authors; (2) focus groups with key informants to explore how social norms and the collective worldviews of newsgroup participants shape the ways different social types behave; and (3) a survey addressed to a general population of newsgroup users to gain an understanding of how various social types view their own information behavior and that of others.;This dissertation uses the theory of normative behavior (Chatman 2000) to address the concepts of worldviews (shared understanding of the small world), social norms (what is perceived to be right or wrong in the group), social types (generalized classification of a person or persons) and information behaviors (how a person acts upon given information) exhibited by members of Usenet newsgroups. Implications are suggested for academics seeking a framework for studying online discussion groups, system designers needing advice on how to set up a user community, end users looking for clues on how to decipher and judge information that is being shared, content creators wanting ways to synthesize and preserve important content, and community managers desiring to know how various social types interact with information in order to maximize the experience for the users and the understanding for an organization.
机译:在线社区用户面临的一个越来越困难的挑战是如何评估陌生人生成的内容的质量和可信度。在帮助和支持问题解答新闻组中尤其如此,在该新闻组中,界面中几乎没有显示任何信息来显示作者在小组中的地位或声誉,或他们通常在在线讨论环境中的过去行为。此外,在线讨论组的不同用户以不同的方式行为和与信息交互。本文研究了在在线讨论组中与其他人交互时通过各种社会类型表现出来的行为。为了确保研究的严格性,采用了多种方法,包括:(1)按汇总新闻组和作者对新闻组发布行为进行细分; (2)与主要信息提供者组成的焦点小组,探讨社会规范和新闻组参与者的集体世界观如何塑造不同社会类型的行为方式; (3)针对广大新闻组用户的调查,以了解各种社会类型如何看待自己的信息行为以及其他人的信息行为。;本文使用规范行为理论(Chatman 2000)解决了这些概念。世界观(对小世界的共同理解),社会规范(在群体中被认为是对还是错),社会类型(一个人或多个人的一般分类)和信息行为(一个人如何根据给定的信息采取行动)由Usenet新闻组成员展示。建议以下方面为学者提供帮助:研究框架,以研究在线讨论组;系统设计人员需要有关如何建立用户社区的建议;最终用户则需要有关如何解密和判断正在共享的信息的线索;内容创建者需要合成的方法并保留重要的内容,社区管理者希望了解各种社交类型如何与信息交互,以最大程度地为用户提供体验和对组织的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号