首页> 外文学位 >The Crucible of Complexity: Community Organization and Social Change in Bronze Age Transylvania (2700-1320 BC)
【24h】

The Crucible of Complexity: Community Organization and Social Change in Bronze Age Transylvania (2700-1320 BC)

机译:复杂性的坩埚:特兰西瓦尼亚青铜时代(公元前2700-1320年)的社区组织和社会变革

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines the development of regional polities with institutionalized inequality in Bronze Age Transylvania, Romania (2700-1320 BC). During the Bronze Age, southwest Transylvania became one of the most important mining regions in Europe, providing the copper, tin, and gold that funded the establishment of permanent social hierarchies across the continent. Through a holistic approach across social, economic, and ideological institutions, I document how communities living in these metal-rich mountains participated in, and were effected by, these social, political, economic, and ideological transformations. Specifically, I focus on two interrelated research questions: (1) How were communities in the mining districts of southwest Transylvania organized during the Bronze Age, and (2) How did community organization in southwest Transylvania change throughout the Bronze Age?;This study makes two important contribution to the culture history of the Transylvanian Bronze Age. First, I develop an absolute chronology for the Transylvanian Bronze Age based on the largest corpus of dates yet published. Second, I present a regional survey and spatial analyses conducted in Transylvania to document changes in community organization at multiple scales. This study develops the first historical trajectory of the organization of economic, political, social, and ideological institutions in Bronze Age Transylvania.;More broadly, this dissertation builds on existing frameworks for studying community organization in middle-range societies in two key ways. First, it moves beyond political economic approaches to incorporate alternative pathways towards hierarchical complexity. In addition to economic and political realms, ideologies, identities, and how they are materialized are important factors in the institutionalization of inequality. Different institutions, however, will not always be organized the same way. I argue that the coherence and dissonance in the presence of inequalities across institutions is a critical attribute of social organization. Second, it further problematizes the study of change in community organization in middle-range societies. The proposed framework distinguishes qualitative and quantitative changes in how institutions are organized, how they articulate, and social forms that emerge out of human action and institutional conditions.;Through examination of settlement, mortuary, chronological, and artifactual evidence, I argue that inequality became institutionalized only during the Late Bronze Age, centuries later than previously assumed. Throughout the Early and Middle Bronze Ages, there was dissonance across multiple institutions in how inequality was made, marked, and masked. Many institutional changes that occurred throughout the Early and Middle Bronze Age set the stage for Late Bronze Age social transformations. In particular, the expansion of long-distance trade, a diversification in burial rites that emphasized intra-community difference, and an increase in the venues for signaling identities and inequalities provided opportunities for Late Bronze Age communities to reorganize hierarchically. These institutional changes were incremental, and unintentionally created the context in which historically specific events and processes ultimately led to the emergence of complex regional polities.;The social history of communities in southwest Transylvania challenges how archaeologists conceptualize mining districts in Bronze Age Europe. In regions with rich ore sources, more than just metal procurement mattered. In southwest Transylvania, changes in social organization throughout the Bronze Age involved ideological, political, social, and economic institutions beyond metal procurement. The archaeology of pre-state societies in mining districts is uniquely positioned to contribute a deep historical perspective to the origin and evolution of the dynamics of resource extraction.
机译:本文考察了罗马尼亚特兰西瓦尼亚青铜时代(公元前2700-1320年)具有制度化不平等的区域政体的发展。在青铜时代,特兰西瓦尼亚西南部成为欧洲最重要的采矿区之一,提供了铜,锡和金,为建立整个非洲大陆的永久社会等级提供了资金。通过跨社会,经济和意识形态机构的整体方法,我记录了生活在这些金属含量丰富的山区的社区如何参与这些社会,政治,经济和意识形态转变并受到其影响。具体来说,我专注于两个相互关联的研究问题:(1)在青铜时代,特兰西瓦尼亚西南部矿区的社区是如何组织的;(2)在整个青铜时代,特兰西瓦尼亚西南部的社区组织是如何变化的?对特兰西瓦尼亚青铜时代的文化历史有两个重要贡献。首先,我根据尚未发表的最大日期语料库为特兰西瓦尼亚青铜时代制定了绝对的年表。第二,我介绍了在特兰西瓦尼亚进行的区域调查和空间分析,以记录社区组织在多个层面上的变化。这项研究开创了特兰西瓦尼亚青铜时代经济,政治,社会和意识形态机构组织的第一个历史轨迹。;更广泛地讲,本文以两种主要方式建立在研究中层社会社区组织的现有框架之上。首先,它超越了政治经济学的方法,纳入了替代方法,以解决等级复杂性。除了经济和政治领域之外,意识形态,身份以及它们如何实现也是不平等制度化的重要因素。但是,不同的机构不一定总是以相同的方式组织。我认为,机构间存在不平等时的连贯与不和谐是社会组织的关键属性。其次,它进一步使中型社会的社区组织变革研究变得困难。提议的框架在机构的组织方式,机构的表述方式以及由于人类行为和机构条件而产生的社会形式方面进行了定性和定量的变化。;通过研究定居,葬,时间顺序和人为证据,我认为不平等成为了仅在青铜时代晚期才制度化,比以前设想的要晚几个世纪。在青铜器的早期和中期,不平等的产生,标记和掩盖方式在多个机构之间存在分歧。在青铜时代的早期和中期发生的许多制度变迁为青铜时代后期的社会转型奠定了基础。特别是,远距离贸易的扩大,强调族群内部差异的葬礼形式的多样化,以及信号标识和不平等现象的场所的增加,为青铜时代晚期的社区提供了分层重组的机会。这些制度上的变化是渐进的,无意间创造了一个背景,在该背景下历史上特定的事件和过程最终导致了复杂的区域政体的出现。特兰西瓦尼亚西南部社区的社会历史挑战了考古学家如何概念化欧洲青铜时代的矿区。在矿石来源丰富的地区,不仅仅是金属采购至关重要。在特兰西瓦尼亚西南部,整个青铜时代的社会组织变革涉及到金属采购以外的意识形态,政治,社会和经济机构。矿区前州社会的考古学处于独特的位置,可以为资源开采动态的起源和演变提供深刻的历史视角。

著录项

  • 作者

    Quinn, Colin P.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Michigan.;

  • 授予单位 University of Michigan.;
  • 学科 Cultural anthropology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 653 p.
  • 总页数 653
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号