首页> 外文学位 >'Random murder by technology': The role of scientific and biomedical experts in the anti-nuclear movement, 1969--1992.
【24h】

'Random murder by technology': The role of scientific and biomedical experts in the anti-nuclear movement, 1969--1992.

机译:``技术谋杀'':1969--1992年,科学和生物医学专家在反核运动中的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation analyzes the work of activist-oriented American physicians and scientists in the late 1960s, assessing how they challenged policy makers to seriously address the risks associated with nuclear power and nuclear weapons technology between 1969 and 1992. Specifically, this project focuses on the activities of Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR), International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW), and Rosalie Bertell, who worked under the auspices of three organizations---the Ministry of Concern for Public Health (MCPH), the Jesuit Centre for Social Faith and Research (JCSFR), and the International Institute of Concern for Public Health (IICPH). All of these non-profit organizations were founded during the third wave of the anti-nuclear movement---UCS in 1969, PSR in 1979, IPPNW in 1981, MCPH and JCSFR in 1978, and IICPH in 1983. They fit neatly into sociologist, Scott Frickel's definition of "public interest science organizations," which are "distinguished by their explicit mission to seek ways to use science for the benefit of the public and by their connections to political movements." As well, the scientific and technological concerns of each of these organizations were all somehow related to the public health and/or environmental consequences of nuclear technology. The dissertation argues that the pre-existing hierarchy in the sciences (where physics and engineering were favoured over 'softer' sciences like medicine and epidemiology), the ways that gender ideology shaped the practice of science, and the tendency of the nuclear bureaucracy and the American media to feminize the work of social activists uniquely influenced the approach to activism within each of these groups. These same factors (as well as the relative size of each organization) structured the evolution of each group's understanding of nuclear risks.
机译:本文分析了以激进主义者为中心的美国医师和科学家在1960年代后期的工作,评估了他们如何挑战决策者以认真应对1969年至1992年之间与核电和核武器技术相关的风险。具体而言,该项目着重于活动科学家联合会(UCS),社会责任医师(PSR),国际预防核战争医师(IPPNW)和罗莎莉·伯泰尔(Rosalie Bertell)在三个组织的主持下工作---公众关注部健康(MCPH),耶稣会社会信仰和研究中心(JCSFR)和国际公共卫生关注研究所(IICPH)。所有这些非营利组织都是在反核运动的第三次浪潮中成立的-UCS于1969年,PSR于1979年,IPPNW于1981年,MCPH和JCSFR于1978年以及IICPH在1983年。它们非常适合社会学家,斯科特·弗里克尔(Scott Frickel)对“公共利益科学组织”的定义,“由于其明确的使命寻求利用科学为公众造福的途径以及与政治运动的联系而有所区别”。同样,每个组织的科学技术关注都与核技术的公共健康和/或环境后果有某种联系。论文认为,科学中已有的等级制度(物理学和工程学比医学和流行病学等“软性”科学更受青睐),性别意识形态塑造科学实践的方式以及核官僚主义和美国媒体女性化社会活动家的工作独特地影响了这些群体中的活动主义方法。这些相同的因素(以及每个组织的相对规模)构成了每个小组对核风险的理解的演变。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rumiel, Lisa A.;

  • 作者单位

    York University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 York University (Canada).;
  • 学科 History United States.;Economics History.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 472 p.
  • 总页数 472
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:17

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号