首页> 外文学位 >The choice between real and accounting earnings management.
【24h】

The choice between real and accounting earnings management.

机译:在实际收益管理和会计收益管理之间进行选择。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study develops a theoretical model and presents empirical evidence on cross-sectional variation in managers' choice of accounting earnings management (AEM) and real earnings management (REM). AEM refers to managers' opportunistic use of the flexibility allowed under General Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to change reported earnings without changing the underlying cash flows. REM refers to managers' opportunistic timing and structuring of operating, investing and financing transactions to affect reported earnings in a particular direction; it results in sub-optimal business consequences and imposes a real cost on the firm.;The study examines how AEM and REM are jointly affected by firms' growth prospects and managers' market-based compensation incentives. It first develops a model that describes how managers choose between AEM and REM in a capital market setting when they face both short-run and long-run incentives. The model, which provides a theoretical framework for analyzing the interactions between the manager's AEM and REM decisions and the capital market's pricing of the firm, yields several testable hypotheses. First, when the firm's growth prospects are favorable, the fine will boost current period earnings through AEM, but not REM. Second, when the sensitivity of the manager's compensation to stock price goes up, the firm will use AEM, but not REM, to inflate current period earnings. Third, when the market's pricing of earnings becomes higher, the manager will prefer AEM to REM in order to achieve short-term earnings objectives.;The study uses a sample of fines that barely meet or beat analysts' earnings forecasts to test these predictions. It focuses on managers' real manipulation of R&D expenditures to measure REM and Dechow et al.'s (2003) method of estimating managers' accrual manipulation to measure AEM. The univariate results indicate a strong positive (negative) relation between AEM (REM) and firm's growth prospects. They also indicate that REM (AEM) decreases (weakly increases) with the sensitivity of the manger's compensation to stock price. The multivariate analyses show that AEM (REM) increases (decreases) as the firm's growth prospects become better and the sensitivity of the manger's compensation to stock price becomes more pronounced. They also indicate that AEM increases but REM does not change significantly when the market's pricing of earnings becomes higher.
机译:这项研究建立了一个理论模型,并提供了有关经理选择会计盈余管理(AEM)和实际盈余管理(REM)的横断面变化的经验证据。 AEM是指经理人利用一般公认会计原则(GAAP)允许的灵活性来更改报告的收益而不更改基本现金流量。 REM是指经理人的机会性时机和业务,投资及融资交易的结构,以在特定方向上影响报告的收益;该研究考察了AEM和REM如何受企业的增长前景和经理人员基于市场的薪酬激励共同影响。首先,它开发了一个模型,描述了经理在短期和长期激励下在资本市场中如何选择AEM和REM。该模型为分析经理的AEM和REM决策与企业的资本市场定价之间的相互作用提供了理论框架,得出了一些可检验的假设。首先,当公司的增长前景良好时,罚款将通过AEM(而非REM)提高当期收益。其次,当经理人的薪酬对股票价格的敏感性提高时,公司将使用AEM而非REM来增加当期收益。第三,当市场的收益定价变得更高时,经理将更倾向于AEM而不是REM,以实现短期收益目标。该研究使用的罚款样本几乎无法达到或超过分析师的收益预测,以检验这些预测。它侧重于管理人员对R&D支出的实际操纵以衡量REM和Dechow等人(2003)估计管理人员应计操纵以衡量AEM的方法。单变量结果表明AEM(REM)与公司的增长前景之间存在很强的正(负)关系。他们还表明,随着经理人对股票价格的补偿的敏感性,REM(AEM)下降(微弱增加)。多元分析表明,随着公司的增长前景变得更好,经理人对股票价格的敏感性变得更加明显,AEM(REM)会增加(减少)。他们还表明,当市场收益定价提高时,AEM会增加,但REM不会发生显着变化。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chen, Zeyun.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Houston.;

  • 授予单位 University of Houston.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Accounting.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 90 p.
  • 总页数 90
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号