首页> 外文学位 >The Cologne Progressives: Political painting in Weimar Germany.
【24h】

The Cologne Progressives: Political painting in Weimar Germany.

机译:科隆进步派:德国魏玛的政治绘画。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

During the Weimar Republic (1918-1933), German artists and critics championed different, often opposing, strategies aimed at synthesizing art and left-wing politics. These endeavors ranged from propagandistic expressionist print work in the immediate post-war period to the use of new technologies such as film and photography to serve the aims of the German Communist Party (KPD) in the late 1920s and early 1930s. My dissertation addresses the strategy formulated by the gruppe progressiver kunstler (group of progressive artists), more commonly known as the Cologne Progressives, in the context of these broader debates.;Never a member of the KPD and dismissive of party politics in general, the leading theorist of the Cologne Progressives, Franz Wilhelm Seiwert (1894-1933), made an impassioned call to unify artistic form and socialist content. Seiwert and two of his closest associates, Heinrich Hoerle (1895-1936) and Gerd Arntz (1900-1988), placed enormous pressure on the strict compositional structure and tactile surface of the artwork. They considered these formal characteristics inextricable from their desire to participate in the formation of a future socialist society. In his definition of Handwerk (craft) as the visible process of art-making, Seiwert rhetorically situated his project in opposition to what he saw as the formal values of Neue Sachlichkeit (commonly translated as New Objectivity), a popular term for representational painting in the 1920s characterized in large part by smooth surface finish. My analysis of Seiwert's critique of painters such as George Grosz and Otto Dix challenges current assumptions of Neue Sachlichkeit as synonymous with socially critical Weimar-period painting. Based on extensive primary research, including detailed analysis of contemporary art criticism and previously unknown artworks, my detailed case study argues for the necessary reevaluation of the role of the relationship between painterly techniques and radical politics. In order to so, my dissertation tracks the evolution of Seiwert's thought and the artwork of the Cologne Progressives throughout the Weimar Republic.
机译:在魏玛共和国(1918年至1933年)期间,德国艺术家和评论家倡导了旨在将艺术与左翼政治进行综合的不同,常常是相互对立的策略。这些努力的范围从战后即刻的宣传表现主义印刷作品到使用电影和摄影等新技术来实现1920年代末和1930年代初德国共产党(KPD)的目标。在这些更广泛的辩论中,我的论文针对的是由进步主义者kunstler(进步艺术家团体)(通常被称为科隆进步主义者)制定的策略。从来没有成为KPD成员并且对党的政治不屑一顾。科隆进步派的主要理论家弗朗兹·威廉·塞维尔特(Franz Wilhelm Seiwert,1894-1933年)热情洋溢地呼吁统一艺术形式和社会主义内容。 Seiwert和他的两个最亲密的伙伴Heinrich Hoerle(1895-1936)和Gerd Arntz(1900-1988),对艺术品的严格构图结构和触感施加了巨大压力。他们认为这些形式上的特征与他们参与未来社会主义社会形成的愿望密不可分。塞韦特(Seiwert)在他的定义中将手工艺品(craft)定义为艺术创作的可见过程,与他所看到的Neue Sachlichkeit的形式价值(通常被翻译为“新客观性”)相对立,他的作品与之相反。 1920年代的主要特征是表面光洁度高。我对Seiwert对乔治·格罗兹(George Grosz)和奥托·迪克斯(Otto Dix)等画家的批评的分析挑战了Neue Sachlichkeit的当前假设,这些假设是社会批判的魏玛时期绘画的代名词。基于广泛的基础研究,包括对当代艺术批评和以前未知的艺术品的详细分析,我的详细案例研究主张对绘画技术与激进政治之间关系的作用进行必要的重新评估。为此,我的论文追踪了塞维尔特思想的演变以及整个魏玛共和国科隆进步派的艺术作品。

著录项

  • 作者

    Roth, Lynette.;

  • 作者单位

    The Johns Hopkins University.;

  • 授予单位 The Johns Hopkins University.;
  • 学科 History European.;Political Science General.;Art History.;Fine Arts.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 370 p.
  • 总页数 370
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号