首页> 外文学位 >Russian liberal intellectuals and the articulation of the nation (the late 1980s to early 1990s).
【24h】

Russian liberal intellectuals and the articulation of the nation (the late 1980s to early 1990s).

机译:俄罗斯的自由派知识分子和国家的话语权(1980年代末至1990年代初)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The following thesis investigates the development of Russian liberal intellectuals' discourse on the Russian national identity and the Russian nation from the late 1980s to early 1990s. This study seeks an answer to the question as to what concepts of the nation were supported by Russian liberal intellectuals, and what was the overall legacy of this particular group for the Russian nation-building process. This work argues that Russian liberal intellectuals underwent a social identity crisis while trying to redefine their position within a century-old triangle of “intellectuals- narod (the people)-vlast'(state/power).” This crisis directly affected Russian liberal intellectuals' discourse on the nation-building process. The majority of Russian liberal intellectuals supported the primordial vision of Russia, described along ethnic and linguistic lines. A civic nationalism was supported by a fraction of intellectuals after the concepts of the narod and the vlast' were reformulated as unsuitable for the nation-construction. Nevertheless, Russian liberal intellectuals' discourse on nation helped to envision an independent Russia outside of the USSR. Russian liberal intellectuals brought liberal values such as individualism and democracy, civil liberties, and human rights into the political discourse and into the discourse on the Russian national identity. At the same time, they constructed Russianness on the contradictory notion of universalism and uniqueness, as rooted in an imperial identity with the leading role of ethnic Russians over the territory with unclear geographical, cultural, and political borders. This version of Russianness was envisioned by liberal intellectuals as closely connected to their leading role among ethnic Russians.
机译:以下论文调查了1980年代末至1990年代初俄国自由派知识分子关于俄国民族身份和俄国民族的论述的发展。本研究寻求以下问题的答案:俄罗斯自由派知识分子对国家的哪些概念给予了支持,以及这个特殊群体对俄罗斯建国进程的整体遗产是什么?这项工作认为,俄罗斯的自由派知识分子经历了社会认同危机,同时试图重新定义他们在一个“知识分子-纳罗德人(人民)-国家/权力”(国家/权力)百年历史中的地位。这场危机直接影响了俄罗斯自由派知识分子对国家建设进程的论述。俄罗斯的大多数自由派知识分子都支持按照种族和语言来描述俄罗斯的原始视野。在将“贱民”和“虚无”的概念重新表述为不适合国家建设之后,一部分知识分子支持了公民民族主义。尽管如此,俄罗斯自由派知识分子对国家的论述帮助在苏联之外构想了一个独立的俄罗斯。俄罗斯自由派知识分子将自由主义价值观(例如个人主义和民主,公民自由和人权)带入了政治讨论和有关俄罗斯民族认同的讨论中。同时,他们以普遍主义和独特性的相互矛盾的观念来建构俄罗斯性,这种观念植根于帝国认同之中,俄罗斯人在领土,文化和政治边界不明的领土上起着主导作用。自由主义知识分子认为这种版本的俄罗斯性与其在俄罗斯族裔中的领导作用密切相关。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kalnaus, Yuliya.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Nevada, Reno.;

  • 授予单位 University of Nevada, Reno.;
  • 学科 Slavic Studies.;History Russian and Soviet.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 142 p.
  • 总页数 142
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号