首页> 外文学位 >A comparison of sublingual and intranasal routes for administration of vitamin B12 to human subjects.
【24h】

A comparison of sublingual and intranasal routes for administration of vitamin B12 to human subjects.

机译:维生素B12向人类受试者给药的舌下和鼻内途径的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Clinical studies have compared the efficacy of intravenous versus intramuscular, orally ingested versus intramuscular, sublingual transmucosal versus intramuscular as well as intranasal transmucosal versus intramuscular vitamin B12 supplementation; however, sublingual transmucosal versus intranasal transmucosal vitamin B12 supplementation has never been compared. This study recruited 55 subjects without preexistent vitamin B12 deficiency and compared the serum vitamin B12 level 2 hours following sublingual transmucosal and intranasal transmucal administration of a 500 mcg cyanocobalamin USP gel. One subject failed to complete the study.;Although no statistically significant difference between the serum vitamin B12 levels was expected after sublingual versus intranasal administration of 500 mcg of cyanocobalamin USP gel, it was found that intranasal administration resulted in a significant although temporary elevation in serum vitamin B12 levels as compared to oral administration (p-value <0.0001). Serum vitamin B12 levels following intranasal administration increased by a mean of 528 mcg/dL, while serum vitamin B12 levels following oral administration increased by a mean of 57 mcg/dL. Despite the 9 fold greater dose response for intranasal administration, the one month persistence of a single 500 mcg dose of vitamin B12 was nonexistent for both routes of administration, with the change in the mean pre-dose serum vitamin B12 level of 0.52 mcg/dL for oral dosing and -4.78 mcg/dL for intranasal dosing.;Based on the results of this small study, intranasal administration of cyanocobalamin is more efficacious than the sublingual route of administration. Although a larger study with more frequent serum vitamin B12 sampling to determine a dose response curve for each administration route is needed to provide a definitive answer to the question of most efficacious route of administration for vitamin B12, this study powerfully suggests that intranasal administration of vitamin B12 500 mcg/uL gel is superior to sublingual administration. A secondary analysis of the data did real, however, a concerning trend suggesting that, even in healthy subjects without vitamin B12 deficiency, there is no persistent effect on serum vitamin B12 levels after a single 500 mcg dose of vitamin B12 by either the intranasal route or the oral route.
机译:临床研究已经比较了静脉内,肌肉内,口服,肌肉内,舌下透粘膜,肌肉内以及鼻内透粘膜与肌肉内补充维生素B12的疗效;然而,从未对舌下透粘膜与鼻内透粘膜补充维生素B12进行过比较。这项研究招募了55位既不存在维生素B12缺乏症的受试者,并比较了舌下经粘膜和鼻内经粘膜给予500 mcg氰钴胺素USP凝胶2小时后的血清维生素B12水平。一名受试者未能完成研究。;尽管在舌下和鼻腔内给予500 mcg cyanocobalamin USP凝胶后,血清维生素B12水平之间没有统计学上的显着差异,但发现鼻内给药虽然血清中暂时升高,但仍具有显着差异与口服相比,维生素B12含量较高(p值<0.0001)。鼻内给药后的血清维生素B12水平平均增加了528 mcg / dL,而口服给药后的血清维生素B12水平平均增加了57 mcg / dL。尽管鼻内给药的剂量反应高9倍,但两种给药途径均不存在单月500 mcg剂量的维生素B12的持久性,剂量前血清维生素B12的平均水平变化为0.52 mcg / dL口服给药为-4.78 mcg / dL,鼻内给药为-4.78 mcg / dL。基于这项小型研究的结果,鼻内施用氰钴胺素比舌下给药途径更有效。尽管需要进行更大范围的血清维生素B12抽样研究以确定每种给药途径的剂量反应曲线,才能对维生素B12最有效的给药途径问题提供明确的答案,但这项研究有力地表明,鼻内给药维生素B12 500 mcg / uL凝胶优于舌下给药。然而,对数据的二次分析确实确实存在,但一个令人担忧的趋势表明,即使在没有维生素B12缺乏症的健康受试者中,通过任一鼻内途径单次服用500 mcg维生素B12后,对血清维生素B12水平也没有持久性影响。或口头途径。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ramirez, Maurice Anthony.;

  • 作者单位

    Union Institute and University.;

  • 授予单位 Union Institute and University.;
  • 学科 Nutrition.;Pharmacology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 100 p.
  • 总页数 100
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号