首页> 外文学位 >Resisting reconciliation: State power and everyday life in post-genocide Rwanda.
【24h】

Resisting reconciliation: State power and everyday life in post-genocide Rwanda.

机译:抵抗和解:种族灭绝后卢旺达的国家权力和日常生活。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation is a political ethnography of state-society relations in post-genocide Rwanda. It challenges much of the conventional post-genocide literature which focuses on the behaviour and practices of urban elites, provides a top-down perspective on the socio-political climate in contemporary Rwanda and treats the regime of the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) as a unitary actor in its efforts to promote "one Rwanda for all Rwandans" in the name of national unity and reconciliation. The dissertation employs the concept of everyday resistance to identify and analyse the power relations between ordinary people and the Rwandan state, to show how individuals are positioned in relation to state power, and how this positioning affects their life chances in the post-genocide order.;The dissertation also argues that Rwanda's rigid socio-political hierarchy limits the ability of ordinary Rwandans to reconcile with one another. It also argues that the programme of national unity further limits their willingness to reconcile with neighbours and friends. It opens up avenues of future research both in Rwanda and other African societies, where layered domination is commonplace and is legitimated through practices of coercive compliance.;The dissertation argues that the programme of national unity and reconciliation constitutes a mechanism of state power that presents a self-serving version of history and manipulates the language of ethnicity to justify and maintain policies of exclusion in much the same way as previous regimes in Rwanda have done. In the name of national unity and reconciliation, the RPF maintains tight control over the socio-political landscape with myriad negative consequences for ordinary peasant Rwandans at the lowest rungs of society. Specifically, the dissertation finds that the programme of national unity and reconciliation is at odds with their interests as peasants since its aims do not accord with the exigencies of everyday rural life. Indeed, many ordinary Rwandans trace the illegitimacy of the programme of national unity and reconciliation to the mediating role that local officials play in its implementation, a finding which challenges the RPF's assertions to western donors and journalists that its post-genocide policies enjoy broad-based grassroots support.
机译:本文是种族灭绝后卢旺达国家与社会关系的政治民族志。它对种族灭绝后的许多传统文献提出了挑战,这些文献集中讨论了城市精英的行为和做法,为当代卢旺达的社会政治气候提供了自上而下的视角,并将卢旺达爱国阵线(RPF)政权视为统一行动者以民族团结与和解的名义努力促进“所有卢旺达人一个卢旺达人”。本文运用“日常抵抗”的概念来识别和分析普通民众与卢旺达国家之间的权力关系,以展示个人与国家权力之间的关系,以及这种定位如何在种族灭绝后的秩序中影响他们的生活机会。论文还指出,卢旺达僵化的社会政治等级制度限制了普通卢旺达人彼此和解的能力。它还认为,民族团结计划进一步限制了他们与邻居和朋友和解的意愿。它为卢旺达和其他非洲社会的未来研究开辟了道路,在这些社会中,分层统治很普遍,并且通过强制遵守的实践得以合法化。;论文认为,民族团结与和解方案构成了国家权力机制,该机制体现了国家权力。自我服务的历史版本,并操纵种族语言来证明和维持排斥政策,其方式与卢旺达以前的政权一样。卢旺达爱国阵线以民族团结与和解的名义保持对社会政治格局的严格控制,这对处于社会底层的普通农民卢旺达人造成了诸多负面影响。具体而言,论文发现民族团结与和解方案与他们作为农民的利益背道而驰,因为该方案的目标与日常农村生活的紧迫性不符。的确,许多普通的卢旺达人将民族团结与和解方案的非法性追溯到地方官员在执行方案中所起的调解作用,这一发现挑战了RPF对西方捐助者和记者的断言,即种族灭绝后的政策享有广泛的基础。基层的支持。

著录项

  • 作者

    Thomson, Susan M.;

  • 作者单位

    Dalhousie University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Dalhousie University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 330 p.
  • 总页数 330
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 非洲史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号