首页> 外文学位 >Understanding waste from a climate change perspective: Municipal solid waste management in Canada.
【24h】

Understanding waste from a climate change perspective: Municipal solid waste management in Canada.

机译:从气候变化的角度了解废物:加拿大的城市固体废物管理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis analyses the current solid waste management situation in Canada to determine the most effective methods of managing solid waste. To arrive at best practices for sustainable waste management, the relationships between waste composition, diversion efforts, management methods and landfill characteristics were explored for 97 Canadian landfills. Municipal solid waste undergoes biological decomposition to generate landfill gas, a potent greenhouse gas that contributes to global warming. In addition I developed: (1) a statistical analysis of operations and their impact on methane generation, and (2) waste management guidance to reduce emissions from the solid waste sector.Best practices for managing landfills and waste include increased depth, greater compaction, waste diversion and landfill gas capture. These could control pollution and conserve landfill space. Higher disposal fees are significantly statistically related to better waste management practices, such as greater compaction rates (i.e., higher density) and greater depth, as well as more diversion. The average depth of a Canadian landfill is 20 meters with the deepest being 50 meters. If the national average depth was doubled, this action would double the average life of Canadian landfills. The survey showed that the average density of waste is about 750 kg/cubic meter, varying from 125 to 1380 kg/cubic meter. If the national average for waste compaction is increased to 1380 kg/metre, this would have the overall effect of nearly doubling the amount of waste that can be placed into the same landfill space. In addition, higher disposal fees are correlated with lower per capita waste production.Methane recovery is only occurring at 52 landfills but should be carried out at all landfills above a minimum size to reduce greenhouse gases (GHG). Currently, many provinces have targeted landfill gas recovery as part of their greenhouse gas mitigation strategy. Major questions remain with respect to actual methane production in landfill sites. Therefore, to see if operational factors impact emissions production, recovered methane emissions were statistically analyzed. The average absolute error between the statistically modeled and recovered methane from the 29 landfills is 44%. In addition, the linear regression model with an R2 = 0.832, showed that landfill emissions are positively correlated with landfill depth, density and organic waste and negatively correlated with waste diversion.In 2005, only a small portion of the waste stream was recovered or composted. Finally, waste diverted in 2005 from 97 active landfills produced a net decrease of approximately three million tonnes of GHG emissions. Considering all the benefits of waste diversion and its impact on GHG emissions, all municipalities should adopt curbside composting and recycling programs as part of the waste solution to reduce greenhouse gas production and waste generation.Landfill space is in short supply with many landfills reaching their capacity. In order to save landfill space and prevent further harm to the atmosphere, best practices in waste management have to be embraced by landfill sites across Canada. Based on the limited capacity of landfills in many regions of Canada and growing waste generation per capita a shortage of landfill space is expected in the next twenty years, which increases the pressure for sustainable waste management practices.
机译:本文分析了加拿大目前的固体废物管理状况,以确定最有效的固体废物管理方法。为了获得可持续废物管理的最佳实践,对加拿大97个垃圾填埋场的垃圾成分,转移工作,管理方法和垃圾填埋场特征之间的关系进行了探索。城市固体废物经过生物分解后产生垃圾填埋气,垃圾填埋气是导致全球变暖的有力温室气体。此外,我还开发了:(1)对运营及其对甲烷生成的影响进行统计分析,以及(2)减少固体废物部门排放的废物管理指南。管理垃圾填埋场和废物的最佳做法包括增加深度,加大压实度,废物转移和垃圾填埋气收集。这些可以控制污染并节省垃圾掩埋空间。从统计学上讲,更高的处置费与更好的废物管理实践显着相关,例如更高的压实率(即更高的密度)和更大的深度以及更多的转移。加拿大垃圾填埋场的平均深度为20米,最深处为50米。如果全国平均深度增加一倍,该行动将使加拿大垃圾填埋场的平均寿命增加一倍。调查显示,废物的平均密度约为750千克/立方米,范围从125至1380千克/立方米。如果将全国垃圾压实平均值提高到1380公斤/米,则总体效果是可将可放入同一垃圾填埋场的垃圾量几乎翻倍。此外,较高的处置费与较低的人均废物产生量有关。甲烷回收仅在52个垃圾填埋场进行,但应在最小尺寸以上的所有垃圾填埋场进行以减少温室气体(GHG)。当前,许多省份已将垃圾填埋气回收作为其温室气体减排策略的一部分。有关垃圾填埋场实际甲烷生产的主要问题仍然存在。因此,为了查看操作因素是否影响排放量,对回收的甲烷排放量进行了统计分析。从29个垃圾填埋场进行统计建模和回收的甲烷之间的平均绝对误差为44%。此外,R2 = 0.832的线性回归模型表明,垃圾填埋场的排放与垃圾填埋场的深度,密度和有机废物呈正相关,与废物转移呈负相关.2005年,只有一小部分废物流被回收或堆肥。最后,2005年从97个活跃的垃圾掩埋场转移过来的废物净减少了约300万吨的温室气体排放。考虑到废物转移的所有好处及其对温室气体排放的影响,所有市政当局都应将路边堆肥和循环利用方案作为废物解决方案的一部分,以减少温室气体的产生和废物的产生。 。为了节省垃圾填埋场的空间并防止对大气的进一步损害,加拿大各地的垃圾填埋场必须采用废物管理的最佳实践。基于加拿大许多地区的垃圾填埋场容量有限以及人均垃圾产生量不断增加,预计在未来20年内将出现垃圾填埋空间不足,这将加剧可持续垃圾管理实践的压力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bonam, Rathan Kumar.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Manitoba (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Manitoba (Canada).;
  • 学科 Natural Resource Management.Environmental Sciences.
  • 学位 M.N.R.M.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 118 p.
  • 总页数 118
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号