首页> 外文学位 >Development of an error matrix algorithm (EMA) for calibrating land cover data.
【24h】

Development of an error matrix algorithm (EMA) for calibrating land cover data.

机译:开发用于校准土地覆盖数据的误差矩阵算法(EMA)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Reference data and error matrix are commonly used to calculate a variety of accuracy statistics for thematic maps. In this thesis, we presented an algorithm called EMA (Error Matrix Algorithm) to increase the accuracy of land cover data based on the error matrix. The method is based on an assumption that classification errors often occur on shared edges of land cover types. The goal is to correct that type of misclassifications according to the statistics of the error matrix and neighborhood relationships.;Theoretically, EMA has more potential to increase accuracy comparing with some commonly used filter, such as the majority function in ArcGIS. We obtained an optimal threshold of 1/8 for EMA by carrying out experiments in Lafayette area of Indiana assuming a perfectly classified map. The preliminary experiment in Lafayette area supported that EMA can be used to increase the accuracy of land cover data by using reference data that covers a sub-area.;The overall accuracies of both NLCD 2001 and GAP in Kansas were increased significantly by applying EMA either on subareas or the whole state. The Kappa statistic also shows that both data were improved, with NLCD 2001 more significantly. Meanwhile, the consistency between the two data was increased by carrying out Z-test of Kappa. The more convincing evaluation of EMA is to randomly select a part of reference data to run EMA and use the rest to assess it. Statistical data shows that EMA works well for NLCD 2001 but not so well for GAP.;In general, EMA is helpful to increase classification accuracy of land cover data, especially for those with relatively low accuracy.
机译:参考数据和误差矩阵通常用于计算主题图的各种准确性统计信息。在本文中,我们提出了一种称为EMA(误差矩阵算法)的算法,以基于误差矩阵提高土地覆被数据的准确性。该方法基于以下假设:分类错误通常发生在土地覆盖类型的共享边缘上。目的是根据错误矩阵和邻域关系的统计信息来纠正这种错误分类的类型。从理论上讲,与某些常用过滤器(例如ArcGIS中的多数功能)相比,EMA具有更大的潜力来提高准确性。通过在印第安纳州的拉斐特地区进行实验(假设地图完全分类),我们获得了EMA的最佳阈值1/8。拉斐特(Lafayette)地区的初步实验支持EMA可通过使用覆盖子区域的参考数据来提高土地覆被数据的准确性。通过应用EMA可以显着提高堪萨斯州NLCD 2001和GAP的总体精度在分区或整个州。 Kappa统计数据还显示,这两个数据都得到了改善,而NLCD 2001更为明显。同时,通过对Kappa进行Z检验来提高两个数据之间的一致性。对EMA更具说服力的评估是随机选择一部分参考数据来运行EMA,然后使用其余信息对其进行评估。统计数据表明,EMA在NLCD 2001上效果很好,但在GAP上效果不佳。总的来说,EMA有助于提高土地覆被数据的分类精度,尤其是对于那些精度相对较低的数据。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wu, Yue.;

  • 作者单位

    Purdue University.;

  • 授予单位 Purdue University.;
  • 学科 Remote Sensing.;Land Use Planning.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 97 p.
  • 总页数 97
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号