首页> 外文学位 >Making Cultures: Politics of Inclusion, Accessibility, and Empowerment at the Margins of the Maker Movement.
【24h】

Making Cultures: Politics of Inclusion, Accessibility, and Empowerment at the Margins of the Maker Movement.

机译:创造文化:创客运动边缘的包容性,可及性和赋权政治。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Historically an elite, formally-trained, and Western-centric population has dominated technology development, creating an inequity in who decides what roles technoscience will play, and how it will affect different publics. More recently, tactics to counter observed inequities have taken the form of citizen science, "civic science", science shops, science for the people, as well as Do It Yourself (DIY) movements such as the "Maker Movement". This dissertation joins the growing body of scholarly explorations into the development of such technoscientific practices and analyses of whether and how they open up the stage for "technological citizenship".;While it stands to be seen if these interests or shifts are permanent and what impact they might have, if the Maker Movement is poised to make any kind of change in the realms of democratizing technology innovation and production, re-industrializing the US, and changing educational practices, STS will be a helpful touchstone for critically-engaging and informing such transformations. In highlighting the sociocultural underpinnings of makerspaces and hackerspaces, STS scholarship will bring a reconstructivist edge to the maker landscape.;By examining the margins, I trouble the Maker Movement label, the people who hold sway over this categorization, and consider both proponents as well as dissenters from within and without its bounds. I question claims that it's focus is beholden to re-industrialization and the fostering of a cadre of globally competitive engineers. I then focus on characterizing the root mechanisms behind groups trying to make visible the oft implicit barriers facing certain marginalized groups in the technological landscape.
机译:从历史上看,精英,受过正式培训且以西方为中心的人口主导着技术发展,在谁决定技术科学将扮演什么角色以及它将如何影响不同的公众方面造成了不平等。最近,针对观察到的不平等现象的策略已经采取了公民科学,“公民科学”,科学商店,人民科学以及“自己动手”(DIY)运动(例如“创客运动”)的形式。本文结合不断发展的学术探索,研究这种技术科学实践的发展,并分析它们是否以及如何为“技术公民”开辟了舞台。如果创客运动准备在民主化技术创新和生产,重新工业化美国以及改变教育习惯的领域中做出任何形式的改变,那么STS将成为批判性参与和告知此类活动的有用的试金石。转变。在强调创客空间和黑客空间的社会文化基础时,STS奖学金将为创客景观带来重构主义的优势。通过研究利润,我困扰了创客运动标签,人们对这种分类持保留态度,并同时考虑了这两个支持者作为内部和外部的异议者。我质疑声称它着眼于重新工业化和培养具有全球竞争力的工程师队伍。然后,我着重于描述群体背后的根源机制,试图使技术领域中某些边缘群体面临的经常隐性障碍可见。

著录项

  • 作者

    Foster, Ellen Kathleen.;

  • 作者单位

    Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.;

  • 授予单位 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.;
  • 学科 Philosophy of science.;Sociology.;Science education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 349 p.
  • 总页数 349
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:54:23

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号