首页> 外文学位 >From choc en retour to nomadisme en fleche.
【24h】

From choc en retour to nomadisme en fleche.

机译:从选择回归到游牧化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis seeks to analyze and expound upon Aime Cesaire's theory of history, choc en retour from Discours sur le colonialisme and situate William Faulkner's Absalom! Absalom! and Andre Schwarz-Bart's La Mulatresse Solitude (and to a lesser extent Le Dernier des Justes and Go Down, Moses) within this theoretical framework; which presents the Holocaust as the culmination ("retrun shock") of four centuries of colonial violence---from the seventeenth to twentieth centuries---perpetrated by Western powers such as France and the United States. While Cesaire's application to Schwarz-Bart's texts is more standard---with his two novels explicitly linking Antillean slavery to the Holocaust---the connections between American antebellum slavery, the Civil War and consequent decades of racially motivated discrimination and terror in the United States---as presented by Faulkner---have rarely been viewed through choc en retour. This stems from a dearth of research seeking to build upon Aime Cesaire's historical connections, and link concentric histories of violence and exploitation to one another. Thus, this thesis takes a genealogical approach, which also employs Glissant's theorization of nomadisme en fleche. This notion casts imperialism as a perpetually wanton extraction of goods and resources, in which bourgeois states constantly seek out new markets and labor pools in service of metropolitan prosperity; as they engage in increasingly amoral practices (i.e. slavery). Understanding choc en retour in tandem with nomadisme en fleche allows for linkages between seemingly divergent timelines. As a result, this thesis argues that Faulkner and Schwarz-Bart use their novels to show how both France and the United States' domination of various peoples cast as "the Other" and perpetuation of violent exploitative processes through nomadisme en fleche carries the constant threat of "un veritable choc en retour"---leading to Antillean slave rebellions, the Civil, the Holocaust and today's perpetually violent neoliberal world.
机译:本论文旨在分析和阐述艾西·塞萨尔(Aime Cesaire)的历史理论,从殖民主义的“讨论”(Discos sur le le Colonialism)中重选,并把威廉·福克纳(William Faulkner)的押沙龙置于一旁!押沙龙!在这个理论框架内,还有安德烈·施瓦茨-巴特(Andre Schwarz-Bart)的《 La Mulatresse寂寞》(在较小程度上是《摩西五经》)。它把大屠杀看作是法国和美国等西方列强实施的四个世纪殖民暴力(从十七世纪到二十世纪)的顶峰(“重演震惊”)。尽管塞萨尔对施瓦茨-巴特的著作的应用更为规范-他的两本小说明确将安的列斯奴隶制与大屠杀联系了-但美国前战奴隶制,南北战争以及随之而来的数十年来种族动机的歧视和美国之间的联系正如福克纳所言,国家很少被重新审视。这源于缺乏研究,试图建立在埃梅·塞萨尔(Aime Cesaire)的历史联系上,并将暴力和剥削的同心历史相互联系起来。因此,本文采用了家谱学方法,该方法也采用了格里桑特对游牧民族的理论化。这种观念将帝国主义视为对商品和资源的永久性剥夺,资产阶级国家在其中不断寻求新的市场和劳动力,以服务于大都市的繁荣。当他们从事越来越多的不道德行为(即奴役)时。了解游牧民族与游牧民族一脉相承,可以在看似不同的时间表之间建立联系。结果,本论文认为,福克纳和施瓦茨-巴特用他们的小说来展示法国和美国对各种民族的统治,都被视为“他者”,以及通过游牧民族的暴力剥削过程的持续存在不断带来威胁。的“不真实的选择” —导致安的列斯奴隶叛乱,内乱,大屠杀以及当今永无止境的暴力新自由主义世界。

著录项

  • 作者

    McElhinny, Paul T.;

  • 作者单位

    University of South Carolina.;

  • 授予单位 University of South Carolina.;
  • 学科 Comparative literature.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 96 p.
  • 总页数 96
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号