首页> 外文学位 >Unifying qualitative and quantitative database preferences to enhance query personalization.
【24h】

Unifying qualitative and quantitative database preferences to enhance query personalization.

机译:统一定性和定量数据库首选项,以增强查询个性化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Data drives all aspects of our society, from everyday life, to business, to medicine, and science. It is well-known that query personalization can be an effective technique in dealing with the data scalability challenge, primarily from the human point of view. In order to personalize their query results, user's need to express their preferences in an effective manner. There are two types of preferences: qualitative and quantitative. Each preference type has advantages and disadvantages with respect to expressiveness. The most important disadvantage of the quantitative model is that it cannot support all types of preferences while the qualitative model can only create a partial order over the data, which makes it impossible to rank all the results. The hypothesis of this dissertation is that it is possible to overcome the disadvantages of each preference type by combining both of them, in a single model, using the notion of intensity. This dissertation presents such a hybrid model and a practical system that has the ability to convert the intensity values of qualitative preferences into intensity values of quantitative preferences, without losing the qualitative information. The intensity values allow to create a total order over the tuples in the database that match a user's preferences as well as to significantly increase the coverage of preferences. Hence, the proposed model eliminates the disadvantages of the existing two types of preferences. This dissertation formalizes the hybrid model using a preference graph and proposes an algorithm for efficient preference combination, which is evaluated in an experimental prototype. The experiments show that: (1) intensity plays a crucial role in determining the order of selecting and applying the preferences, and simply ordering the preferences based on the intensity value is not necessarily sufficient; (2) the model can achieve three orders of magnitude increase in coverage compared to other alternatives; (3) the solution proposed outperforms other Top-k algorithms by being able to use both qualitative and quantitative preferences at the same time, and (4) the algorithm proposed is efficient in terms of time complexity, returning tuples ordered by the intensity value in a matter of seconds.;Keywords: Qualitative Preferences, Quantitative Preferences, Top-K Ranking.
机译:数据驱动着我们社会的各个方面,从日常生活到商业,从医学到科学。众所周知,主要从人的角度来看,查询个性化可以成为应对数据可伸缩性挑战的有效技术。为了个性化他们的查询结果,用户需要以有效的方式表达他们的偏好。有两种类型的偏好:定性和定量。每种偏好类型在表现力方面都有优点和缺点。定量模型的最重要缺点是,它不能支持所有类型的偏好,而定性模型只能对数据创建偏序,从而无法对所有结果进行排名。本文的假设是,可以通过使用强度概念在单个模型中将二者组合在一起,从而克服每种偏好类型的缺点。本文提出了一种混合模型和实用系统,能够在不丢失定性信息的情况下将定性偏好的强度值转换为定量偏好的强度值。强度值允许在数据库中的元组上创建与用户的首选项匹配的总顺序,并显着增加首选项的覆盖范围。因此,所提出的模型消除了现有的两种偏好类型的缺点。本文利用偏好图对混合模型进行形式化,并提出了一种有效的偏好组合算法,该算法在实验原型中进行了评估。实验表明:(1)强度在确定选择和应用偏好的顺序中起着至关重要的作用,仅根据强度值对偏好进行排序并不一定足够; (2)与其他替代方案相比,该模型可以将覆盖率提高三个数量级; (3)提出的解决方案能够同时使用定性和定量首选项,从而胜过其他Top-k算法;(4)提出的算法在时间复杂度方面很高效,返回以强度值排序的元组几秒钟的时间;关键字:定性偏好,定量偏好,Top-K排名。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gheorghiu, Roxana.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pittsburgh.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pittsburgh.;
  • 学科 Computer science.;Information science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 125 p.
  • 总页数 125
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号