首页> 外文学位 >'According to All That You Demanded' (Deut 18:16): The Literary Use of Names and Leitworte As Antimonarchic Polemic in the Deuteronomistic History.
【24h】

'According to All That You Demanded' (Deut 18:16): The Literary Use of Names and Leitworte As Antimonarchic Polemic in the Deuteronomistic History.

机译:“根据您所要求的一切”(申命记18:16):姓名和莱特沃特在文学上的使用,是氘代历史上的反君主制论战。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Deuteronomistic History (Dtr) is a story with a message for Israel in exile. It tells the story of Israel's leadership from its entry, under Moses and Joshua, into the land covenanted to its ancestors to its eventual expulsion from the land under monarchy. The story begins with the people's "request" for distance from Yhwh, a request granted in the form of intermediary prophetic leadership (Deut 18:15-22). Thereafter, Israel's deteriorating leadership situation results in further "requests." Human kingship, which Israel "demands" (1 Samuel 8-12) to remedy its leadership's failures, swiftly leads---except in rare instances---to even greater national apostasy. Israel, Judah, and their "demanded" monarchies' sins culminate in exile from the land.;This study explores Dtr's thematic use of onomastic wordplay in his narrative evaluations of some of the principal figures involved in the rise and eventual fall of the monarchy in Israel and Judah, this in terms of the legislation of Deuteronomy.The names and biographies of Samuel and Saul are linked together by the Leitwort sa'al("ask," "request," "beg," "demand"). The tragic arcs of David and his heir Solomon-Jedidiah's lives are told in terms of the Leitwort ahab/'aheb ("love") and its antonyms. The Leitwort 'slm/shalom links David's sons Absalom and Yhwh and itself. Rather than enjoying eternal dynastic "peace" from Yhwh Solomon to Dtr's concern for Israel's loss of "peace" and "wholeness" with as boasted by Solomon (1 Kgs 2:33), David's house, including its "good" kings, experience a "peace" that fits Yhwh's program of "recompensing" Judah for its covenant violations. The fate of the priestly house of Eli is typological of the fate of Israel and Judah's royal houses as evident in Dtr's thematic play on the name "Ichabod" ("Where is the Glory?"). Dtr also plays on the names of Tiglath-pileser and Nebuchadnezzar, Israel and Judah's exilers and final despoilers, in terms of galâ and 'otsar. Josiah's name is reinterpreted positively in terms of Deuteronomic "fire," but also recalling the proto-king Abimelech (Judges 9). The message to the exiles is one of warning about the nature of its "requests" from Yhwh, perhaps especially regarding Jehoiachin's son Shealtiel after the death of the former in exile.
机译:氘论历史(Dtr)是一个故事,带有流亡以色列的信息。它讲述了以色列领导地位的故事,从进入摩西和约书亚以来进入其祖先盟约的土地到最终从君主专制国家被驱逐出去的故事。故事始于人们对与耶和华的距离的“要求”,这是以中间先知领导的形式给予的要求(申命记18:15-22)。此后,以色列不断恶化的领导地位导致进一步的“要求”。以色列“要求”人类王权(撒母耳记8-12)来纠正其领导层的失败,这种情况很快导致了更大的民族叛乱(除非在极少数情况下)。以色列,犹大及其“被要求君主立宪制”的罪恶最终在土地上流放。以色列和犹大,这是在申命记的立法上。塞缪尔和扫罗的名字和传记由里沃特·萨尔(“问”,“请求”,“乞求”,“需求”)联系在一起。大卫和他的继承人所罗门·杰迪亚(Solomon-Jedidiah)的悲剧性都以“莱沃特(Lietwort)ahab /'aheb”(“爱”)及其反义词来形容。利沃沃特(Leitwort)的Slm / Shalom将大卫的儿子押沙龙(Absalom)和耶和华(Yhwh)与其本身联系起来。大卫的殿堂,包括所罗门王(1公斤2:33),没有享受耶和华所罗门王朝对Dtr担心以色列失去“和平”和“全盛”的永恒王朝“和平”的经历,符合耶和华对约旦的违反行为“补偿”犹大计划的“和平”。埃利(Eli)牧师府的命运是以色列和犹大王室的命运的类型,这一点在Dtr的主题剧《伊卡博德》(“荣耀在哪里?”)中可以明显看出。 Dtr还使用galâ和'otsar来扮演Tiglath-pileser和Nebuchadnezzar,以色列和犹大的流放者和最后的破坏者的名字。约西亚的名字在申命记的“火”方面得到了积极的诠释,但同时也让人联想起原型王阿比米勒(法官9)。向流亡者传达的信息是对耶和华发出的“要求”性质的警告之一,也许尤其是关于前者流亡后约雅琴的儿子谢尔蒂尔的情况。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bowen, Matthew L.;

  • 作者单位

    The Catholic University of America.;

  • 授予单位 The Catholic University of America.;
  • 学科 Religion Biblical Studies.;Literature General.;Near Eastern Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 540 p.
  • 总页数 540
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:53:49

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号