首页> 外文学位 >Retrofitting Jerusalem: Conceptions of Space, Identity, and Power in Ezra-Nehemiah.
【24h】

Retrofitting Jerusalem: Conceptions of Space, Identity, and Power in Ezra-Nehemiah.

机译:改造耶路撒冷:以斯拉尼希米记中的空间,身份和权力概念。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Ezra-Nehemiah appears as a single book in the Jewish canonical tradition, and scholarly consensus since Tamara Cohn Eskenazi's In an Age of Prose has likewise leaned toward treating the book as a literary and ideological unity. I challenge this consensus. I argue that Ezra and Nehemiah, though they are compositionally interrelated, present largely incommensurate representations of Judah's restoration. I use spatial theory to highlight the ideological fissures in Ezra-Nehemiah. By studying the conceptual spatiality of Ezra-Nehemiah, I am able to compare and contrast the representations of Jerusalem in relation to the world around it across the book of Ezra-Nehemiah. The two devices that unify Ezra-Nehemiah are the book's conceptions of the city of Jerusalem in relation to empire and the book's articulations of the boundaries of the community that inhabits the city. Four distinct and internally coherent conceptual spatialities emerge, and these correspond roughly with the four major compositional strata proposed in the redactional analyses of Kratz and Wright: Ezra 1-6, Ezra 7-10, Neh 1-6, and Neh 7-13.;The book of Ezra limits the cultic community around Yhwh's temple to returnees from the Babylonian Judean diaspora, and it idealizes open-ended imperial domination. Through their written edicts, Persian emperors act as Yhwh's agents, sponsoring the reconstruction and beatification of Yhwh's temple, ensuring that its cult is performed according to his standards, and protecting the Judean community from outside interference. The Judeans, by relinquishing any claim to political autonomy, guarantee the sanctity of their temple and their community. The book of Nehemiah, by contrast, reasserts Judean sovereignty over Jerusalem and its environs. In Neh 1-6, autochthonous Judeans rebuild Jerusalem's wall, and in so doing they achieve local autonomy for Judah as a province within the Persian Empire. The wall, however, proves incapable of excluding foreign influence from the province, and that influence, in turn, threatens Judean autonomy. The introduction of Babylonian Judeans in Neh 7 and the fusion of the autochthonous and diaspora communities around Torah in Neh 8-10 sets the stage for the sanctification of Jerusalem's wall and the possibility of Judean sovereignty over Judean territory in the future.
机译:Ezra-Nehemiah在犹太规范传统中是一本书,自从Tamara Cohn Eskenazi的《散文时代》同样倾向于将这本书视为文学和意识形态的统一以来,在学术上已达成共识。我对这一共识提出挑战。我认为,以斯拉记和尼希米记虽然在成分上是相互联系的,但它们在很大程度上代表了犹大复兴的不相称。我使用空间理论来强调以斯拉尼希米记中的意识形态裂痕。通过研究以斯拉-尼希米记的概念空间,我可以比较和对比以斯拉-尼希米记中耶路撒冷与其周围世界的关系。统一以斯拉-尼希米记的两个手段是:书中关于帝国的耶路撒冷城的构想,以及书中对城市居民社区边界的明确表述。出现了四个截然不同且内部连贯的概念空间,这些空间大致对应于Kratz和Wright的编校分析中提出的四个主要成分层次:以斯拉1-6,以斯拉7-10,尼1-6和尼7-13。 ;以斯拉的书将围绕耶和华的庙宇的邪教团体限制为来自巴比伦犹太人散居国外的海归,并且它使无限制的帝国统治成为了理想。波斯皇帝通过其书面e令,充当耶和华的代理商,赞助对耶和华的庙宇进行重建和美化仪式,确保按照其标准进行庙宇崇拜,并保护犹太人社区免受外界干扰。犹太人放弃了对政治自治的任何主张,从而保证了其寺庙和社区的神圣不可侵犯。相比之下,尼希米记则重申了犹太人对耶路撒冷及其周围地区的主权。在尼赫1-6年,土生土长的犹太人重建了耶路撒冷的城墙,并以此实现了犹大作为波斯帝国内一个省的地方自治权。然而,隔离墙被证明无法排除该省的外国影响力,而这种影响又反过来威胁了犹太人的自治。 Neh 7中引入巴比伦犹太人,Neh 8-10中Torah周围的土生土人和散居社区的融合,为耶路撒冷的城墙圣化和将来犹太人对犹太领土的主权创造了条件。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jones, Christopher M.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Religion Biblical Studies.;Jewish Studies.;Religion General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 384 p.
  • 总页数 384
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号