首页> 外文学位 >Empirical evidences on risk-taking and performance of mutual fund.
【24h】

Empirical evidences on risk-taking and performance of mutual fund.

机译:关于共同基金的冒险和绩效的经验证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper examines the relationship between performance and risk exposure for mutual funds. The preliminary analysis fails to support the tournament hypothesis, which predicts that poorly performing managers will increase risk exposure while outperforming managers will decrease risk exposure. Instead, we find evidence of risk reduction for extreme losers and risk increase for winning managers. Besides, the risk-taking fails to align manager interest with shareholder interest since the returns from the risk enhancement by winners and the risk reduction by losers is relatively worse than those with contradictory strategies. Overall, the competition among fund managers appears to affect management risk choice, and in turn has an effect on future performance. However, the effect of shifting risk on fund performance and the approach of altering portfolio risk vary with fund style and prior performance.;Keywords: mutual fund, tournament hypothesis, risk-taking, fund performance
机译:本文研究了共同基金的绩效与风险敞口之间的关系。初步分析未能支持比赛假设,该假设预测表现不佳的经理会增加风险敞口,而业绩出色的经理会减少风险敞口。相反,我们发现有证据表明,极端失败者可以降低风险,而胜任的经理则可以增加风险。此外,冒险行为未能使经理人的利益与股东利益保持一致,因为赢家带来的风险增加和输家带来的风险减少的收益要比那些采取自相矛盾的策略的收益相对差。总体而言,基金经理之间的竞争似乎会影响管理风险的选择,进而影响未来的表现。然而,风险转移对基金绩效的影响以及改变投资组合风险的方法随基金风格和先前的绩效而变化。关键词:共同基金,锦标赛假设,冒险,基金绩效

著录项

  • 作者

    Lu, Jingchang.;

  • 作者单位

    Singapore Management University (Singapore).;

  • 授予单位 Singapore Management University (Singapore).;
  • 学科 Economics Finance.;Business Administration Banking.
  • 学位 M.Sc.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 67 p.
  • 总页数 67
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号