首页> 外文学位 >The role of the simple natures and method in Descartes' meditations.
【24h】

The role of the simple natures and method in Descartes' meditations.

机译:笛卡尔冥想中简单本质和方法的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

My topic is the continuity of thought from Descartes' earliest writings to his mature thought as expressed in the Meditations. In the early work, the Rules, Descartes replaces the scholastic form-matter model of the physical world with a quantitative description of the physical as matter in a Euclidian space.;In the first two chapters I examine the early work showing its break with scholasticism and the structure of his new vision. The Rules was Descartes first major work; it was to consist of thirty six rules. It was neither completed nor published. He stopped working on it in 1628, completing only twenty one rules with commentary on the first eighteen. The first twelve are the philosophically interesting ones. In those he develops a method based on mathematical proofs and introduces a set of basic principles he calls `simple natures' which are intuitively known. This model has the simple principles (natures) analogous to the postulates and axioms of Euclidian geometry. From the principles complex problems are solved by reducing the terms to those of the simple natures and re-constructing the problem in those terms. While the Rules emphasizes material natures as the basis for physical science, he also introduces a definition of mind as thought.;In the next two chapters I argue that this basic structure of method and simple natures carries over into the Meditations. The goal is different but the tools are the same. The definitions of matter and mind that Descartes sets in Meditation II are the same as in the Rules: mind as thought and matter as extension. Doubt, which is often taken as the new method is shown to be just a part of the early stage of the original method. It is used to reduce a complex to simples by eliminating any uncertainties until an indubitable simple nature is reached: the cogito..;In the final chapter I examine the problem of apparent contrasting explanations of true and immutable natures in Meditation V and the First Reply. I argue that they are compatible if we understand natures in terms of the principles of the Rules..
机译:我的主题是从笛卡尔最早的著作到沉思中表达的成熟思想的连续性。在早期的工作《笛卡尔规则》中,用对欧几里得空间中物质作为物质的定量描述代替了物理世界的学术形式-物质模型。在前两章中,我研究了早期作品表明了其与学术性的突破。以及他的新愿景的结构。该规则是笛卡尔的第一项主要工作。它由36条规则组成。它既没有完成也没有出版。他于1628年停止工作,仅完成了二十一条规则,并对前十八条进行了评论。前十二个是哲学上有趣的。在这些书中,他开发了一种基于数学证明的方法,并介绍了一套他称之为直觉已知的“简单性质”的基本原理。该模型具有类似于欧几里得几何的假定和公理的简单原理(性质)。根据这些原理,可以通过将术语简化为简单性质的术语并重新构建这些术语来解决复杂的问题。虽然《规则》强调物质自然是物理科学的基础,但他还介绍了思想即思维的定义。在接下来的两章中,我认为方法和简单自然的这种基本结构会延续到冥想中。目标不同,但工具相同。笛卡尔在冥想II中对物质和思想的定义与规则中的定义相同:思想作为思想,物质作为扩展。常常被视为新方法的怀疑被证明只是原始方法早期的一部分。它通过消除所有不确定性直到达到不可逾越的简单本质,将复杂性简化为简单形式:cogito ..;在最后一章中,我研究了冥想V和“第一回复”中对真实和不变性质的明显对比解释的问题。 。我认为,如果我们根据《规则》的原则理解性质,则它们是兼容的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fowler, Thomas.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Albany.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Albany.;
  • 学科 Metaphysics.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 185 p.
  • 总页数 185
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号