首页> 外文学位 >Association between Electronic Health Records Meaningful Use Attestation and Medicare Spending per Beneficiary among US Hospitals
【24h】

Association between Electronic Health Records Meaningful Use Attestation and Medicare Spending per Beneficiary among US Hospitals

机译:美国医院间电子健康记录有意义的使用证明与每个受益人的医疗保险支出之间的关联

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: Evidence that the Electronic Health Records (EHRs) system improves care quality and cost efficiency was inconclusive. We examined the association between EHR implementation and hospital cost efficiency.;Measurement: We used Meaningful Use Attestation Stage (MU stage) to represent the EHR adoption level of hospitals. Hospital efficiency was measured by Medicare spending per beneficiary (MSPB) scores---a ratio of risk-adjusted hospital MSPB amount to national median MSPB amount across all hospitals.;Study design: Secondary data are from the CMS (Hospital Compare and EHR Incentive Programs) which include 3051 hospitals nationwide data from 2012 to 2016. We examined the heterogeneous relationship between the stage level of Meaningful Use Attestation (MU stage) and hospital Medicare spending per beneficiary (MSPB) scores at thousands of US hospitals nationwide between 2012 and 2016. The ownership status and bed number of hospitals were used as hospital characteristics. Hospital Retrospective difference-in-difference model in an interrupted time series approach was employed to examine the change of cost efficiency of entering MU stage.;Results: 1)The MU stage status distribution of US hospitals became more polarization during the study period. (only 1.07 percent hospitals be in MU stage 1 at 2016, while 49,4 percent without MU stage status and 49.5 entered MU Stage) 2) Hospital ownership was similar across hospitals with distinct MU stages. Bed number, on the other hand, was significantly difference by MU stage status, where higher MU stage hospitals were more likely to have more bed number (p<0.0001). Hospitals with 50 to 300 beds were more likely to remain in the status without meeting MU stage requirements. And the hospitals with more than 300 beds were more likely to meet MU stage requirements, for 60.91% of second group and 58.71% for third group hospitals have more than 300 beds, compared to 27.73% of first group. Hospitals with more bed numbers are more likely to entering higher MU stage. 3) After analyze the standard error and 95% CI of the MSPB score, there was no statistically significant difference between the MSPB scores of hospitals before and after entering MU stage.;Conclusions: 1) The MU stage status distribution of US hospitals became more polarized during the study period. 2) Hospital ownership was similar across hospitals with distinct MU stages. Bed number, on the other hand, was significantly difference by MU stage status, where higher MU stage hospitals were more likely to have more bed number (p<0.0001). 3)MU stage status of hospitals wasn't significantly associated hospitals' MSPB scores in the study period.
机译:目的:电子健康记录(EHR)系统可提高护理质量和成本效率的证据尚无定论。我们研究了电子病历实施与医院成本效率之间的关联。度量:我们使用了有意义的使用证明阶段(MU阶段)来代表医院的电子病历采用水平。医院效率通过每位受益人的医疗保险支出(MSPB)得分来衡量-风险调整后的医院MSPB数量与所有医院中全国MSPB中间值的比率。研究设计:辅助数据来自CMS(医院比较和EHR激励这些计划包括2012年至2016年全国3051家医院的数据。我们研究了2012年至2016年美国数千家医院的有意义使用证明的阶段水平(MU阶段)与每位受益人的医院医疗保险支出(MSPB)得分之间的异质关系医院的所有权状态和床位数被用作医院的特征。采用间断时间序列的医院回顾性差异模型研究了进入MU阶段的成本效率的变化。结果:1)在研究期间,美国医院的MU阶段状态分布更加两极化。 (2016年只有1.07%的医院处于MU阶段1,而没有MU阶段状态的医院为49.4%,进入MU阶段的医院为49.5)2)在具有不同MU阶段的医院之间,医院所有权相似。另一方面,床位数在MU分期状态上有显着差异,在MU分阶段较高的医院更可能有更多的床数(p <0.0001)。拥有50到300张病床的医院更有可能保持现状,而未达到MU阶段的要求。拥有300张以上床位的医院更有可能满足MU阶段要求,第二类医院的床位超过300张的比例为60.91%,第三类医院的58.71%,第一组的比例为27.73%。床位数更多的医院更有可能进入更高的MU阶段。 3)通过分析MSPB得分的标准误和95%CI,进入MU阶段前后医院的MSPB得分之间差异无统计学意义。结论:1)美国医院的MU阶段状态分布越来越多在研究期间两极分化。 2)在具有不同MU阶段的医院之间,医院所有权相似。另一方面,床位数在MU分期状态上有显着差异,在MU分阶段较高的医院更可能有更多的床数(p <0.0001)。 3)在研究期间,医院的MU阶段状态与医院的MSPB得分无关。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gai, Cong.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Public health.;Health care management.;Economics.
  • 学位 M.P.H.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 20 p.
  • 总页数 20
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号