首页> 外文学位 >Differences in risk behaviors, intimate partner violence, and HIV & STI prevalence among men who have sex with men and men who have sex with men and women in China.
【24h】

Differences in risk behaviors, intimate partner violence, and HIV & STI prevalence among men who have sex with men and men who have sex with men and women in China.

机译:在中国,与男性发生性关系的男性和男性与男性发生性行为的男性之间的风险行为,亲密伴侣暴力以及艾滋病毒和性传播感染患病率的差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction: Intimate partner violence (IPV) research has primarily focused on heterosexual couples, but has been largely ignored among men who have sex with men. Differences in risk behaviors and IPV prevalence between men who have sex exclusively with men (MSM) and men who have sex with both men and women (MSMW) have important implications for HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STI) transmission. We examined differences in IPV prevalence, risk behaviors, HIV/STI testing, self-reported HIV/STI diagnoses, and linkage to and retention in HIV care between MSM and MSMW across China.;Methods: Men who have sex with men over the age of 16 were recruited through three MSM-focused websites in China. An online survey containing items on sociodemographics, risk behaviors, IPV, testing history, self-reported HIV/STI diagnosis, and linkage to and retention in HIV care was completed from September-October 2014. Chi-square tests and logistic regression analyses were conducted.;Results: Among 610 participants, 182 (29.8%) reported experiencing at least one type of IPV. MSMW were at significantly greater risk for IPV (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.65, 95% CI [1.08-2.53]) compared to MSM. Men who had experienced IPV were more likely to have participated in group sex (AOR 1.86, 95% CI [1.08-3.21]), to have had sex in exchange for gifts or money (AOR 5.06, 95% CI [2.47-10.35]), and to report a positive HIV diagnosis (AOR 2.59, 95% CI [1.22-5.51]). Among 1,363 participants, MSMW were less likely to use a condom during last anal sex (p≤0.01) and more likely to engage in group sex (p≤0.01) and transactional sex (p≤0.01) compared to MSM. HIV/STI testing rates and self-reported STI and HIV serostatus between MSM and MSMW were similar.;Conclusion: There is a hidden epidemic of IPV among MSM and MSMW in China. Given their different prevalences of risk behaviors, Chinese MSM and MSMW may benefit from different HIV/STI intervention and prevention strategies. Achieving a successful decrease in HIV/STI epidemics among Chinese men who have sex with men and avoiding potential HIV/STI outbreaks across numerous populations, including Chinese women, will depend on the ability of targeted and culturally-congruent HIV/STI control programs to facilitate a reduction in risk behaviors.
机译:简介:亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)研究主要针对异性伴侣,但在与男性发生性关系的男性中被很大程度上忽略了。仅与男性发生性关系的男性(MSM)和男性与女性发生性行为的男性(MSMW)之间的危险行为和IPV患病率的差异对HIV和性传播感染(STI)的传播具有重要意义。我们研究了中国各地男男性接触者和男男性接触者之间IPV患病率,风险行为,HIV / STI检测,自我报告的HIV / STI诊断以及与HIV护理的联系和保留之间的差异;方法:男性与年龄以上的男性发生性关系通过在中国的三个以MSM为重点的网站,招募了16名员工。从2014年9月至10月,我们完成了一项在线调查,内容涉及社会人口统计学,风险行为,IPV,检测历史,自我报告的HIV / STI诊断以及与HIV护理的联系和保留。进行了卡方检验和逻辑回归分析结果;在610名参与者中,有182名(29.8%)报告经历了至少一种IPV。与MSM相比,MSMW患IPV的风险要高得多(调整后的优势比(AOR)为1.65,95%CI [1.08-2.53])。经历过IPV的男性更有可能参加团体性交(AOR 1.86,95%CI [1.08-3.21]),进行性行为以换取礼物或金钱(AOR 5.06,95%CI [2.47-10.35] ),并报告HIV阳性诊断(AOR 2.59,95%CI [1.22-5.51])。在1,363名参与者中,与MSM相比,MSMW在最后一次肛交期间使用安全套的可能性较小(p≤0.01),而更可能参加团体性行为(p≤0.01)和性交行为(p≤0.01)。 MSM和MSMW之间的HIV / STI检测率以及自我报告的STI和HIV血清状况相似。结论:中国MSM和MSMW之间存在IPV的隐性流行。鉴于他们的危险行为流行程度不同,中国MSM和MSMW可能会从不同的HIV / STI干预和预防策略中受益。要成功减少与男人发生性关系的中国男性中的HIV / STI流行,并避免在包括中国女性在内的众多人群中爆发潜在的HIV / STI爆发,将取决于针对性和文化背景一致的HIV / STI控制项目的能力,以促进减少风险行为。

著录项

  • 作者

    Davis, Alissa.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana University.;
  • 学科 Epidemiology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 103 p.
  • 总页数 103
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号