首页> 外文学位 >Improving Stress-Induced Hyperglycemia Management in the Intensive Care Setting
【24h】

Improving Stress-Induced Hyperglycemia Management in the Intensive Care Setting

机译:在重症监护环境中改善压力诱发的高血糖管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Uncontrolled stress-induced hyperglycemia has been shown to increase mortality, prolong ICU length of stay, increase complications, and prolong ICU length of stay. The inadequate management of stress-induced hyperglycemia in the intensive care setting is a persistent gap in quality care.;Objective: To implement an evidence-based Stress-induced hyperglycemia protocol in the ICU at NorthBay Medical Center.;Design: Descriptive design with pre-and post-intervention measurement.;Setting: The Intensive Care Unit at NorthBay Medical Center.;Patients: 22 patients with stress-induced hyperglycemia. Eligible patients had a blood glucose level great than or equal to 150 mg/dL.;Intervention: Patients with a blood glucose level greater than or equal to 150 mg/dL were started on sliding scale insulin therapy. Patients with a blood glucose level greater than 180 mg/dl the patient were started on an insulin infusion. If the blood glucose levels were ≤ 100 mg/dl, insulin therapy was discontinued to prevent hypoglycemia. Blood glucose levels were integrated into ICU multidisciplinary rounds to ensure all patients with stress-induced hyperglycemia were identified.;Measurements: ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, average high blood glucose levels, and number of patients who met criteria but were not started on insulin therapy were measured.;Results: The average ICU length of stay pre-protocol implementation (M = 4.18, SD = 2.48) was greater than the average ICU length of stay post-protocol implementation (M = 2.18, SD = 1.83). This difference is statistically significant t (20) = 2.15, p = 0.044; d 0.95. There was no significant 8 difference between pre-protocol implementation hospital length of stay (M = 9.27, SD = 9.50) and post-protocol implementation hospital length of stay (M = 6.27, SD = 3.82); t (20) = 0.97, p = 0.343. There was no significant difference in average blood glucose levels pre-implementation (M = 197, SD = 69) and post-protocol implementation (M = 189, SD = 40); t (20) = 0.31, p = 0.76. Over half (55%) of the patients in the pre-implementation group met criteria for stress-induced hyperglycemia, however, insulin therapy was not initiated by the ICU healthcare provider. Postimplementation, there was 100% compliance with initiating therapy on those patients that met criteria.
机译:背景:已显示,不受控制的压力诱发的高血糖症会增加死亡率,延长ICU住院时间,增加并发症并延长ICU住院时间。重症监护环境中对压力诱发的高血糖的管理不当是质量护理方面的一个长期差距。目的:在NorthBay医疗中心的ICU中实施循证的压力诱发的高血糖方案。设计:具有描述性的设计-和干预后测量。;地点:NorthBay医学中心的重症监护室;患者:22名压力诱发的高血糖患者。符合条件的患者的血糖水平大于或等于150 mg / dL。干预:血糖水平大于或等于150 mg / dL的患者开始采用滑尺胰岛素治疗。血糖水平大于180 mg / dl的患者开始接受胰岛素输注。如果血糖水平≤100 mg / dl,则应停止胰岛素治疗以防止低血糖。血糖水平被整合到ICU多学科研究中,以确保识别出所有应激性高血糖患者。测量:ICU住院时间,住院时间,平均高血糖水平以及符合标准但未达到标准的患者人数结果:协议实施前的平均ICU停留时间(M = 4.18,SD = 2.48)大于协议实施后的平均ICU停留时间(M = 2.18,SD = 1.83) )。该差异具有统计学意义,t(20)= 2.15,p = 0.044; d 0.95。协议实施前住院时间(M = 9.27,SD = 9.50)与协议实施后住院时间(M = 6.27,SD = 3.82)之间没有显着的8差异。 t(20)= 0.97,p = 0.343。实施前(M = 197,SD = 69)和实施协议后(M = 189,SD = 40)的平均血糖水平无显着差异; t(20)= 0.31,p = 0.76。实施前组中超过一半(55%)的患者符合压力诱发的高血糖标准,但是,ICU医疗保健提供者未开始胰岛素治疗。实施后,符合标准的患者对启动疗法的依从性为100%。

著录项

  • 作者

    Elgrably, Alonya.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Arizona.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Arizona.;
  • 学科 Nursing.;Health care management.
  • 学位 D.N.P.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 52 p.
  • 总页数 52
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:52

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号