首页> 外文学位 >A Queer Liberation Movement? A Qualitative Content Analysis of Queer Liberation Organizations, Investigating Whether They are Building a Separate Social Movement.
【24h】

A Queer Liberation Movement? A Qualitative Content Analysis of Queer Liberation Organizations, Investigating Whether They are Building a Separate Social Movement.

机译:酷儿解放运动?对同性恋解放组织的定性内容分析,调查他们是否正在建立独立的社会运动。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the last forty years, U.S. national and statewide LGBT organizations, in pursuit of "equality" through a limited and focused agenda, have made remarkably swift progress moving that agenda forward. However, their agenda has been frequently criticized as prioritizing the interests of White, middle-class gay men and lesbians and ignoring the needs of other LGBT people. In their shadows have emerged numerous grassroots organizations led by queer people of color, transgender people, and low-income LGBT people. These "queer liberation" groups have often been viewed as the left wing of the GRM, but have not been extensively studied. My research investigated how these grassroots liberation organizations can be understood in relation to the equality movement, and whether they actually comprise a separate movement operating alongside, but in tension with, the mainstream gay rights movement.;This research used a qualitative content analysis, grounded in black feminism's framework of intersectionality, queer theory, and social movement theories, to examine eight queer liberation organizations. Data streams included interviews with staff at each organization, organizational videos from each group, and the organizations' mission statements. The study used deductive content analysis, informed by a predetermined categorization matrix drawn from social movement theories, and also featured inductive analysis to expand those categories throughout the analysis.;This study's findings indicate that a new social movement -- distinct from the mainstream equality organizations -- does exist. Using criteria informed by leading social movement theories, findings demonstrate that these organizations cannot be understood as part of the mainstream equality movement but must be considered a separate social movement. This "queer liberation movement" has constituents, goals, strategies, and structures that differ sharply from the mainstream equality organizations. This new movement prioritizes queer people in multiple subordinated identity categories, is concerned with rebuilding institutions and structures, rather than with achieving access to them, and is grounded more in "liberation" or "justice" frameworks than "equality." This new movement does not share the equality organizations' priorities (e.g., marriage) and, instead, pursues a different agenda, include challenging the criminal justice and immigration systems, and strengthening the social safety net.;Additionally, the study found that this new movement complicates existing social movement theory. For decades, social movement scholars have documented how the redistributive agenda of the early 20th century class-based social movements has been replaced by the demands for access and recognition put forward by the identity-based movements of the 1960s New Left. While the mainstream equality movement can clearly be characterized as an identity-based social movement, the same is not true of the groups in this study. This queer liberation movement, although centered on identity claims, has goals that are redistributive as well as recognition-based.;While the emergence of this distinct social movement is significant on its own, of equal significance is the fact that it represents a new post-structuralist model of social movement. This study presents a "four-domain" framework to explain how this movement exists simultaneously inside and outside of other social movements, as a bridge between them, and as its own movement. Implications for research, practice, and policy in social work and allied fields are presented.
机译:在过去的四十年中,美国全国和全州的LGBT组织通过有限且集中的议程追求“平等”,在推动该议程向前发展方面取得了显着进展。但是,他们的议事日程经常被批评为优先考虑白人,中产阶级的男同性恋者和女同性恋者的利益,而忽略了其他LGBT人士的需求。在他们的阴影下,已经出现了许多由有色人种,变性人和低收入LGBT人民领导的基层组织。这些“酷儿解放”组织经常被视为GRM的左翼分子,但尚未得到广泛研究。我的研究调查了如何从平等运动中了解这些基层解放组织,以及它们是否实际上是与主流同性恋权利运动并肩作战但又与之息息相关的独立运动;该研究基于对内容的定性分析在黑人女权主义的交叉性,酷儿理论和社会运动理论的框架下,研究了八个酷儿解放组织。数据流包括对每个组织的工作人员的采访,每个小组的组织视频以及组织的使命声明。该研究使用演绎内容分析,并根据社会运动理论得出的预定分类矩阵进行归纳,并采用归纳分析将这些类别扩展到整个分析过程中;该研究结果表明,一种新的社会运动-与主流平等组织不同 - 确实存在。使用领先的社会运动理论所依据的标准,研究结果表明,这些组织不能被理解为主流平等运动的一部分,而必须被视为独立的社会运动。这种“酷儿解放运动”的组成,目标,策略和结构与主流平等组织截然不同。这项新运动优先考虑处于多个从属身份类别的酷儿,关注的是体制和结构的重建,而不是实现对组织和结构的访问,它更多地基于“解放”或“正义”框架,而不是“平等”。这项新运动没有平等组织的优先事项(例如婚姻),而是追求不同的议程,包括挑战刑事司法和移民制度,以及加强社会安全网。运动使现有的社会运动理论复杂化。几十年来,社会运动学者记录了20世纪初基于阶级的社会运动的再分配议程如何被1960年代新左派基于身份的运动提出的获取和承认的要求所取代。尽管主流平等运动可以明确地表征为基于身份的社会运动,但本研究中的群体并非如此。这项奇特的解放运动虽然以身份主张为中心,但其目标既是重新分配的又是基于承认的目标;尽管这种独特的社会运动的出现本身很重要,但同样重要的是,它代表着一个新岗位社会运动的结构主义模型。这项研究提出了一个“四域”框架,以解释该运动如何同时存在于其他社会运动的内部和外部,作为它们之间的桥梁以及作为其自身的运动。介绍了对社会工作及相关领域的研究,实践和政策的启示。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Portland State University.;

  • 授予单位 Portland State University.;
  • 学科 Social work.;LGBTQ studies.;Sociology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 598 p.
  • 总页数 598
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:35

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号