首页> 外文学位 >Methods for Effectively Combining Group- and Individual-Level Data.
【24h】

Methods for Effectively Combining Group- and Individual-Level Data.

机译:有效组合组和个人级别数据的方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In observational studies researchers often have access to multiple sources of information but ultimately choose to apply well-established statistical methods that do not take advantage of the full range of information available. In this dissertation I discuss three methods that are able to incorporate this additional data and show how using each improves the quality of the analysis.;First, in Chapters 1 and 2, I focus on methods for improving estimator efficiency in studies in which both population (group) and individual-level data is available. In such settings, the hybrid design for ecological inference efficiently combines the two sources of information; however, in practice, maximizing the likelihood is often computationally intractable. I propose and develop an alternative, computationally efficient representation of the hybrid likelihood. I then demonstrate that this approximation incurs no penalty in terms of increased bias or reduced efficiency.;Second, in Chapters 3 and 4, I highlight the problem of applying standard analyses to outcome-dependent sampling schemes in settings in which study units are cluster-correlated. I demonstrate that incorporating known outcome totals into the likelihood via inverse probability weights results in valid estimation and inference. I further discuss the applicability of outcome-dependent sampling schemes in resource-limited settings, specifically to the analysis of national ART programs in sub-Saharan Africa. I propose the cluster-stratified case-control study as a valid and logistically reasonable study design in such resource-poor settings, discuss balanced versus unbalanced sampling techniques, and address the practical trade-off between logistic considerations and statistical efficiency of cluster-stratified case-control versus case-control studies.;Finally, in Chapter 5, I demonstrate the benefit of incorporating the full-range of possible outcomes into an observational data analysis, as opposed to running the analysis on a pre-selected set of outcomes. Testing all possible outcomes for associations with the exposure inherently incorporates negative controls into the analysis and further validates a study's statistically significant results. I apply this technique to an investigation of the relationship between particulate air pollution and hospital admission causes.
机译:在观察性研究中,研究人员通常可以使用多种信息来源,但最终会选择采用公认的统计方法,而这些方法无法利用现有的全部信息。在这篇论文中,我讨论了三种能够合并这些额外数据的方法,并展示了如何使用每种方法来提高分析的质量。首先,在第1章和第2章中,我着重研究了在两种人群的研究中提高估计效率的方法。 (组)和个人级别的数据可用。在这种情况下,生态推理的混合设计有效地结合了两种信息来源。然而,在实践中,最大化可能性通常在计算上是棘手的。我提出并开发了一种混合可能性的计算替代方法。然后,我证明了这种近似不会增加偏差或降低效率。第二,在第3章和第4章中,我强调了在研究单位为聚类的情况下将标准分析应用于结果依赖型抽样方案的问题。相关的。我证明,通过逆概率权重将已知结果总计合并到可能性中,可以得出有效的估计和推论。我将进一步讨论基于结果的抽样方案在资源有限的环境中的适用性,尤其是对撒哈拉以南非洲国家抗病毒治疗计划的分析。我提出在这种资源匮乏的环境中,将聚类分层的案例控制研究作为一种有效且在逻辑上合理的研究设计,讨论平衡抽样与不平衡抽样技术,并解决在逻辑考虑和聚类分层案例的统计效率之间的实际取舍对照研究与病例对照研究;最后,在第5章中,我证明了将全部可能结果纳入观察数据分析的好处,而不是对预先选择的结果进行分析。测试所有可能的结果与暴露之间的关联性,自然会将阴性对照纳入分析中,并进一步验证研究的统计显著性。我将此技术应用于空气微粒污染与医院入院原因之间关系的调查。

著录项

  • 作者

    Smoot, Elizabeth.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 Statistics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 96 p.
  • 总页数 96
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:23

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号