首页> 外文学位 >Inclusive representation in global decision-making processses: Challenges of democracy, sovereignty, and liberatory politics for marginalized groups.
【24h】

Inclusive representation in global decision-making processses: Challenges of democracy, sovereignty, and liberatory politics for marginalized groups.

机译:全球决策过程中的包容性代表:边缘群体的民主,主权和解放政治的挑战。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This project proposes a framework for liberatory representation that institutionalizes processes to remove domination and meaningfully increasing respect and concern toward marginalized groups on issues that substantively affect them. It argues that decision-making processes that do not offer meaningful influence to those people who are most affected by particular decisions turn those who are supposed to be political equals into wards of dominant groups; essentially turning adults into political children. To meet ideals of political equality, liberatory processes for inclusive decision-making are required. The concept of political adulthood provides the foundation for an examination of current processes designed to bring the voices of affected communities into the governance of global organizations. Dworkin's arguments for "equal respect and concern" and full membership, or "moral membership," in the political community, as the essential democratic conditions provide a theoretical foundation for analysis. Throughout, close attention is paid to the political organizing work of two marginalized groups who have successfully achieved formal representation within specific U.N. bodies: Indigenous Peoples and people living with and affected by HIV. I argue that meaningful democratic decision-making can exist outside of both legislative and geographical boundaries, but only under particular conditions of inclusion and practice. Building on the work of Mansbridge, Williams, and Young, I argue first that we need to clearly understand --- in each instance --- who the affected groups are that require a decision-making voice. Next, following Agamben's "relations of the ban;" Gramscian understandings of civil society power dynamics; and Mouffe and Laclau's work on agonistic democracy; I argue that understanding civil society processes as politics, that is, as spaces for contention characterized by power challenges, is essential for crafting liberatory democratic practices that meaningfully involve the needs and perspectives of those most marginalized. Finally, I offer a framework for processes of liberatory representation within global institutions. I argue that critical democratic conditions that ensure meaningful influence on outcomes, increased status for oppressed groups, and opportunities to develop perceived communities of shared fate across marginalized and dominant groups must be met. Difficult challenges, some specific to the global sphere, must be addressed: the balance of power between states and global institutions that limits manueverability for marginalized groups; structural violence; and ensuring that those subordinated within oppressed groups are meaningfully represented.
机译:该项目提出了一个解放性代表的框架,该框架使消除统治的过程制度化,并在实质上影响到边缘化群体的问题上有意义地增加了对边缘化群体的尊重和关注。它认为,对那些受特定决策影响最大的人没有提供有意义影响的决策过程,将那些本应具有政治平等性的人转变为支配者。从本质上将成年人变成政治孩子。为了实现政治平等的理想,需要进行包容性决策的解放进程。政治成年的概念为审查旨在将受影响社区的声音纳入全球组织治理的当前流程提供了基础。德沃金关于在政治社区中“平等尊重与关心”和正式成员资格或“道德成员资格”的论点作为基本的民主条件提供了分析的理论基础。在整个过程中,密切注意两个边缘群体的政治组织工作,他们在联合国特定机构中成功地取得了正式代表:土著人民和艾滋病毒携带者和受其影响的人。我认为有意义的民主决策可以存在于立法和地理范围之外,但只能在包容性和实践的特定条件下存在。首先,我以曼斯布里奇,威廉姆斯和扬的工作为基础,认为我们需要清楚地了解每种情况下的受影响人群,这些人群需要决策权。接下来,遵循阿甘本的“禁令关系”;葛兰西对民间社会权力动态的理解;穆菲和拉克劳关于激动民主的工作;我认为,将公民社会理解为政治,即以权力挑战为特征的争论空间,对于拟订有意义地涉及最边缘化群体的需求和观点的解放性民主实践至关重要。最后,我为全球机构内的解放代表程序提供了一个框架。我认为,必须满足关键的民主条件,这些条件必须确保对结果产生有意义的影响,增加被压迫群体的地位,并有机会在边缘化和优势群体之间发展共同命运的感知社区。必须解决棘手的挑战,其中一些挑战是全球性的,这些挑战是:国家与全球机构之间的力量平衡,限制了边缘群体的可操纵性;结构性暴力;并确保被压迫团体中的下属得到有意义的代表。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sprague, Laurel.;

  • 作者单位

    Wayne State University.;

  • 授予单位 Wayne State University.;
  • 学科 Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 308 p.
  • 总页数 308
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:17

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号