首页> 外文学位 >The Effects of the Establishment of Conditioned Reinforcement for Observing Books on Rate of Acquisition of Textual Responses with Two- to Four-Year-Old Participants With and without Developmental Delays.
【24h】

The Effects of the Establishment of Conditioned Reinforcement for Observing Books on Rate of Acquisition of Textual Responses with Two- to Four-Year-Old Participants With and without Developmental Delays.

机译:建立有条件的书本加固对具有和不具有发育延迟的2至4岁参与者的文本答复获得率的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I tested the effects of conditioning books on the rate of acquisition of textual responses for 16 participants with (11 participants) or without (5 participants) developmental delays, ranging in age from 2.4 to 4.6 years old, in three experiments. Eight males and 8 females participated; the children were selected from an early intervention/preschool program that implemented a behavior analytic approach to all instruction, and they were selected for participation because they did not have book stimuli as conditioned reinforcers for observing, but they did have the necessary prerequisite skills in repertoire to acquire textual responses. The independent variable was the establishment of books as reinforcers for observing responses and as a preferred activity in a free play area. The dependent variable was the rate of acquisition of textual responses before and after books were established as conditioned reinforcers. The embedded dependent variable was the number of 5s intervals participants observed books in the free play setting, and the embedded independent variable was one of three methods of conditioning book stimuli (textual operant discrimination training, Pavlovian second order conditioning, or conditioning books through peer observation). A non-concurrent multiple pre- and post-intervention probe design across groups was used. In Experiment I, the participants ranged in age from 2.4 to 2.7 years old. Participants A and B acquired conditioned reinforcement for observing books as a function of mastering pre-requisite skills (word/picture discrimination) and one set of sight words. Participants C and D required stimulus-stimulus pairings to acquire books as conditioned reinforcers. Results showed that Participants A-D learned sight words 2.20 to 7.25 times faster as a function of having books as conditioned reinforcers. Experiment II differed in that: a) the participants were 3.7 and 4.6 years old, b) more sets of sight words were taught, and c) free play area probes were conducted with peers with and without books as conditioned reinforcers in a systematic fashion. Participant E acquired conditioned reinforcement for observing books as a function of mastering two sets of sight words. Participant F did not acquire books as conditioned reinforcers through sight word instruction, nor through stimulus-stimulus pairings, but did acquire conditioned reinforcement for observing books as a function of the conditioning books through a peer observation intervention. Results indicated that Participants E and F learned sight words 1.6-2.06 times faster than in pre-intervention conditions. Experiment III differed in that a) additional sight words were taught and b) free play sessions were conducted without peers. Results showed that Participants A1- C3 learned sight words 1.5 to 9 times faster (mean= 3.28 times faster) with the exception of Participant A4, who required a mean of one more session (mean of 3.5 sessions to 4.5 sessions) in post-intervention conditions. Participants A2, A4, B3, and C1, acquired books as reinforcers as a function of textual operant discrimination training (TODT). Marked increases in observing books was noted for Participant C3 after TODT, but not to criterion levels. TODT was not effective for Participants A1, A3, B2, and C2, but Pavlovian second order conditioning (PSOC) was effective for these participants. Neither TODT nor PSOC was successful in conditioning books as reinforcers for Participant B1, but conditioning books through peer observation was successful. Results are discussed in terms of: (a) the different interventions to condition books as reinforcers individualized per the repertoires of the participants, (b) the establishment of books as reinforcers as a developmental cusp, and (c) supporting the argument for the establishment of books as conditioned reinforcers as an empirical definition of reading readiness.
机译:我在三个实验中测试了有条件的书对16名参与者(11名参与者)或没有(5名参与者)发育迟缓(年龄从2.4至4.6岁)的文本参与者获得文字回复率的影响。八男八女参加;这些孩子是从早期干预/学前班计划中挑选出来的,该计划对所有的教学都采用了行为分析方法,他们之所以被选中参加,是因为他们没有书本刺激作为观察的条件强化物,但他们确实具有一定的先决条件获得文字回复。独立变量是建立书籍作为观察反应的加强剂,并作为自由活动区的首选活动。因变量是在书籍被确立为条件加强者​​之前和之后的文本回复获得率。嵌入因变量是参与者在自由活动环境中观察书本的5s间隔数,而嵌入自变量是调节书本刺激的三种方法之一(文本操作辨别训练,巴甫洛夫二阶调节或通过同伴观察来调节书本) )。使用跨组的非并行多个干预前和干预后探针设计。在实验一中,参与者的年龄从2.4岁到2.7岁不等。参与者A和B获得了有条件的强化,以便根据熟练掌握先决技能(单词/图片辨别力)和一组视觉单词来观察书籍。参与者C和D需要进行刺激与刺激配对,以获取书籍作为条件强化剂。结果表明,参与者A-D学习视力单词的速度提高了2.20到7.25倍,这是将书作为条件增强器的作用。实验II的不同之处在于:a)参与者分别为3.7和4.6岁,b)教授了更多的视觉单词集,以及c)对有或没有书籍作为条件强化者的同伴以系统的方式进行了免费游戏区域探查。参与者E通过掌握两组视觉单词而获得了用于观察书籍的条件强化。参与者F既没有通过视觉单词教学也没有通过刺激-刺激配对来获得有条件的强化书,但没有通过同伴观察干预获得根据条件书籍的观察条件的强化。结果表明,参与者E和F的视觉单词的学习速度是干预前的1.6-2.06倍。实验III的不同之处在于:a)教授了更多的视觉单词,并且b)进行了无伴奏的免费游戏。结果表明,参与者A1- C3学习视力单词的速度提高了1.5到9倍(平均= 3.28倍),但参与者A4的干预后平均需要多进行一次会话(平均3.5到4.5会话)条件。参与者A2,A4,B3和C1作为文本操作者歧视训练(TODT)的功能,获得了作为强化者的书籍。在TODT之后,参与者C3的观察书有明显增加,但没有达到标准水平。 TODT对参与者A1,A3,B2和C2无效,但是巴甫洛夫二阶条件调节(PSOC)对这些参与者有效。 TODT和PSOC都没有成功地将书籍作为参与者B1的增强器进行整理,但是通过同伴观察来整理书籍是成功的。根据以下方面讨论了结果:(a)根据参与者的曲目将个性化为强化剂的书以不同的方式干预;(b)将强化剂的书籍确立为发展的风口浪尖;以及(c)支持关于强化的论点作为有条件的强化者的书籍,作为阅读准备的经验定义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Buttigieg, Susan Francelle.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University.;
  • 学科 Reading instruction.;Special education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 242 p.
  • 总页数 242
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号