首页> 外文学位 >THE FORM AND FUNCTIONS OF SCIENCE FICTION: A THEORETICAL STUDY OF ITS DUALISTIC NATURE AND ITS DEPICTION OF ALIEN WORLDS.
【24h】

THE FORM AND FUNCTIONS OF SCIENCE FICTION: A THEORETICAL STUDY OF ITS DUALISTIC NATURE AND ITS DEPICTION OF ALIEN WORLDS.

机译:科幻小说的形式和功能:对它的二元性及其对外星世界的描述的理论研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis defines a theoretical approach to science fiction and applies that approach to SF's creation of alien worlds.;The second half of the thesis applies this distinction to SF's two different methods of creating alien worlds: "conceptual" methods (objectively scientific) and "perceptual" methods (subjectively emotional). The second method requires the medium of characters in the story to express reactions to the alien world, while the first relies solely on physical measurements. I use these methods to explore conventional and experimental writing in several SF works, contrasting the conventional elements in books by Hal Clement, Poul Anderson, Piers Anthony, Larry Niven, Brian Aldiss, and Ray Bradbury, with the more experimental elements in novels by Stanislaw Lem, Fritz Leiber, Joanna Russ, J. G. Ballard, and Gene Wolfe (and I discuss the gradations that fall in between--no SF story is purely experimental or conventional). This analysis demonstrates how dialectical writing "turns around" onto the underlying causes--whether psychological or social--of particular types of alien worlds and examines those causes in the work itself. It shows the difference between those works which fill the universe with the assumptions of a particular society, or of a particular group in that society, or of conventional SF itself, and those other novels which question these same assumptions, which use their alien worlds not as ends in themselves but as means to the end of demonstrating how these assumptions are taken for certainties.;The first half of the study addresses the dualistic nature of SF, the seeming split between its "form" and its various "functions," the notion that what it is used for is perhaps different from what is is. I define SF's form as "fantasy posing as realism because of an apparently scientific frame," and designate its functions as either "conventional" or "experimental." In the conventional mode, SF is a publisher's genre, a popular literature whose assumptions form a collective and ideological future-scenario; it provides comfort and promise for those social groups who believe in the scenario's activities of technological progress, expansion into space, the solving of closed puzzle-like problems (usually technological), and the spreading of individualistic values across the galaxy (free will, domination and exploitation). In this mode, SF is best seen as a commodity, a product of the self-perpetuating circle of supply and demand which supports both the market and the image a social group has of itself. Contrarily, the experimental mode uses "dialectical" thought that examines the perceiving subject as well as the supposedly impartial object, that uses conventional SF topics as means to an end instead of as ends in themselves, that uses alien worlds or future societies as methods for social criticism, satire, prophetic warning, or extrapolation, and not just as the expectable objects of an entertainment medium. In those mode, SF is more of a tool for change and criticism than an enclosed and delimited genre, and is most closely compared to scientific theorizing and "thought-experiments." A major quality of this mode is "self-reflexivity," a turn-around onto the assumptions of SF conventions or of the societies and classes producing SF, and an open questioning of these assumptions in the work: a return from the escapist galactic thrust outward to contemporary problems of self and society.
机译:本论文定义了一种科幻小说的理论方法,并将该方法应用于科幻小说中的外星世界的创造。论文的下半部分将这种区别应用于科幻小说中的两种不同的创造异物世界的方法:“概念”方法(客观上是科学的)和“感知”方法(主观情感)。第二种方法需要故事中的角色媒介来表达对外星世界的反应,而第一种方法仅依靠物理测量。我用这些方法探索了几本科幻作品中的常规和实验性写作,将哈尔·克莱门特,波尔·安德森,皮尔斯·安东尼,拉里·尼文,布莱恩·阿尔迪斯和雷·布拉德伯里的书中的常规元素与斯坦尼斯拉夫小说中的更多实验性元素进行了对比。 Lem,Fritz Leiber,Joanna Russ,JG Ballard和Gene Wolfe(我讨论了介于两者之间的等级-SF故事并非纯粹是实验性的或常规的)。这项分析表明了辩证法写作是如何“转向”特定类型的外星世界的根本原因的,无论是心理原因还是社会原因,并考察了作品本身的原因。它显示了用特定社会,特定社会或特定群体的假设或传统科幻小说本身充满宇宙的那些作品与质疑这些相同假设的其他小说之间的区别,这些小说不使用它们的外来世界;作为目的本身,但作为证明确定性如何采取这些假设的手段的结尾。;研究的前半部分论述了SF的二元性,即它的“形式”与其各种“功能”之间的看似分裂,其用途可能与实际有所不同的观念。我将SF的形式定义为“由于表面上看似科学的框架而将幻想幻想成现实主义”,并将其功能指定为“常规”或“实验性”。在传统模式下,科幻小说是出版者的一种体裁,是一种流行的文学作品,其假设构成了一个集体的和意识形态的未来情景。它为相信该情景的技术进步,向太空扩展,解决封闭的难题之类的问题(通常是技术)以及个人主义价值观在银河中的传播(自由意志,统治)的社会群体提供了安慰和希望。和剥削)。在这种模式下,SF最好被视为一种商品,它是供求关系不断延续的产物,既支持市场,又支持社会团体自身的形象。相反,实验模式使用“辩证性”思想来检验感知对象以及所谓的公正对象,后者使用常规科幻小说主题作为达到目的而不是最终达到目的的手段,并使用外星世界或未来社会作为方法。社会批评,讽刺,预言性警告或推断,而不仅仅是娱乐媒体的预期对象。在那种模式下,科幻小说更像是一种变革和批评的工具,而不是封闭和划定的类型,并且与科学理论和“思想实验”最接近。这种模式的主要特点是“自我反身”,转向SF惯例或产生SF的社会和阶级的假设,并对作品中的这些假设进行公开质疑:从逃避现实的银河推力中返回涉及当代自我和社会问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    WENDLAND, ALBERT WILLIAM.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pittsburgh.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pittsburgh.;
  • 学科 Literature Modern.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1979
  • 页码 314 p.
  • 总页数 314
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号