首页> 外文学位 >Public Spending with Congestion Costs, Two-sector Model, Equilibrium, and Transitional Dynamics.
【24h】

Public Spending with Congestion Costs, Two-sector Model, Equilibrium, and Transitional Dynamics.

机译:具有拥堵成本,两部门模型,均衡和过渡动态的公共支出。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis consists two following chapters: In chapter 1, we build a two-sector model which includes physical and human capital accumulation, and the government spending in both of above production. The government spending is treated as flow. The new thing is, except the improved effects of government input in production, we also add the congestion cost which also follows with the government input to the model of economy. Through the join of congestion effect, we can observe the whole variables shifting in the model with the changes of congestion level. This shifting expresses the changes of the decisions of representative agent to allocate their inputs to production and consumption, and then further affect long-run growth rate and welfare. In order for simplifying, we assume the congestion cost only occurs in physical capital or final output production sector. Besides, we present the simulation of the model with congestion shifting, and broadly finding out the conclusions: 1) the increase of congestion cost will hurt the government spending which is beneficent to the equilibrium growth, and makes growth decline no matter what the sector capital intensities are. 2) On the other hand, increase of congestion cost forces representative agent or household to withdraw their input from production to consumption while growth rate declines simultaneously, and if final output is physical capital intensively, the equilibrium welfare is improved because of the domination of consumption increase. Therefore, if final output is human capital intensively, and then welfare will be decreased since now the negative effect of growth rate decrease dominates. 3) When productivity increases in final output or human capital sector, congestion increase has contrasting effects to the adjustment processes in physical and human capitals which rely on the sector capital intensities and which sector does productivity improvement occur. And also, congestion increase will weaken the benefit of productivity improvement to growth rate in equilibrium. In chapter 2, we expand our model with the congestion costs in both physical and human capital production sectors simultaneously. Since according to the previous literature, the common situation of congestion cost which is discussed before is forced in final output or physical capital sector; the case of human capital sector is rarely and specially analyzed in developing or low-income countries. For this reason, we separate our model into two parts: developed and developing countries by given different ranges of congestion level. With these differences of congestion-defined countries, we can proceed to compare two types of countries with several shifting of given coefficients. Again, with simulating the model with the shifting of congestion, including simple congestion shifting, both congestion shifting in the same direction and both congestion's shifting in opposite directions, we can find the impact of congestion changes to other variables in quantitative and qualitative ways. Generally speaking, the aggregate/net effects from congestion shifting will be majorly influenced by the sector capital intensities in both sectors and secondarily by the congestion levels which define countries. The lesser impact comes from the optimal growth-maximizing and welfare-maximizing fiscal policies being used. Besides, when productivity increases either in final output or in human capital sector, developed countries have slower speed of convergence than developing countries. But when productivity increase causes developing countries to be close to developed countries, their speed of convergence will be retarded by the congestion adjustments in transitional dynamics. Higher congestion cost in public infrastructure causes more effective impact to slow down the speed of adjustments than in public education.
机译:本文由以下两章组成:在第一章中,我们建立了一个两部门模型,包括物质资本和人力资本积累以及以上两个生产中的政府支出。政府支出被视为流量。新的事情是,除了政府投入在生产中的作用得到改善之外,我们还将拥挤成本也随政府投入而增加到经济模型中。通过拥塞效应的加入,我们可以观察到模型中整个变量随拥塞程度的变化而变化。这种转变表达了代表代理人决定将其投入分配给生产和消费的决定的变化,进而进一步影响了长期增长率和福利。为了简化,我们假设拥塞成本仅发生在有形资本或最终产出生产部门。此外,我们给出了具有拥挤转移的模型的仿真,并广泛地得出以下结论:1)拥挤成本的增加将损害有利于均衡增长的政府支出,并且无论部门资本如何,其增长都会下降强度是。 2)另一方面,拥堵成本的增加迫使代表机构或家庭将其投入从生产转移到消费,而增长率同时下降,并且如果最终产出是有形资本密集的话,均衡福利会因为消费的支配而得到改善。增加。因此,如果最终产出集中于人力资本,那么福利将减少,因为现在增长率下降的负面影响占主导地位。 3)当最终产出或人力资本部门的生产率提高时,拥挤的增加与有形和人力资本的调整过程形成了截然不同的效果,后者依赖于部门资本强度,而哪个部门确实会提高生产率。而且,拥塞的增加将削弱生产率提高对均衡增长率的好处。在第二章中,我们同时扩展了物理和人力资本生产部门的拥堵成本模型。由于根据先前的文献,先前讨论的拥堵成本的普遍情况被迫在最终产出或有形资本部门进行;在发展中国家或低收入国家中,很少专门分析人力资本部门的情况。因此,我们将模型分为两个部分:发达国家和发展中国家,其拥堵程度不同。有了拥挤定义国家的这些差异,我们可以继续比较两种类型的国家,其中给定系数有一些偏移。再次,通过模拟拥塞移动的模型,包括简单的拥塞移动,拥塞朝相同方向移动和拥塞朝相反方向移动,我们可以定量和定性地发现拥塞变化对其他变量的影响。一般而言,拥挤转移的总和/净效应将主要受两个部门的部门资本强度影响,其次受到定义国家的拥挤程度的影响。影响较小的是所使用的最佳增长最大化和福利最大化的财政政策。此外,当最终产出或人力资本部门的生产率提高时,发达国家的融合速度要慢于发展中国家。但是,当生产率提高导致发展中国家与发达国家接近时,它们的趋同速度将因过渡动力的拥挤调整而受到阻碍。与公共教育相比,公共基础设施中较高的拥堵成本会导致更有效的影响,从而减慢调整速度。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sun, Chang-Wei.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Buffalo.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Buffalo.;
  • 学科 Economics Theory.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 265 p.
  • 总页数 265
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号